Russia’s Approach to Connectivity in Asia: From Cooperation to Coercion

• Published in: East Asia (Piscataway, N.J.) Vol. 40; no. 3; pp. 317 - 334
• Main Authors: Silvan, Kristiina, Kaczmarski, Marcin
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Dordrecht Springer Netherlands 01-09-2023; Springer; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Coercion; Connectivity; Containment; Cooperation; Duress (Law); Equality; Foreign policy; International aspects; International cooperation; Political aspects; Political Science; Political Science and International Relations; Political Science and International Studies; Postcommunist societies; Social Sciences; Asia; Russia; Eurasia; Connectivity; Integration; Eurasia; Foreign policy; Russia
• ISSN: 1096-6838; 1874-6284
• DOI: 10.1007/s12140-023-09404-w

Russia’s foreign policy concept, last updated in 2023, envisioned economic and political cooperation with countries of the Asia-Pacific as important for advancing Russia’s agenda as a global power and emphasised the need to improve connectivity across Eurasia. This article applies a novel theoretical framework for analysing Russia’s approach to connectivity in Asia since the collapse of the Soviet Union. Drawing from policy documents and secondary sources, the article identifies three different geographical spaces targeted by Russian connectivity policy: East of the Russian Federation, post-Soviet Central Asia, and Greater Eurasia. It is argued that the attempts to improve the cooperative connectivity of the Russian Far East have been half-hearted. In contrast, the attempt to retain and rebuild connectivity within the post-Soviet space has followed the logics of competition, containment, and coercion. Moreover, by promoting the Greater Eurasian Partnership, Russia has sought to keep status equality with China against the backdrop of the latter’s Belt and Road Initiative. The article maintains that Russia is a connectivity actor of its own right, even if there is a major gap between its connectivity strategy and its implementation. It further suggests that the war in Ukraine has accelerated the trend towards coercion and disconnectivity.