Assigning breed origin to alleles in crossbred animals

• Published in: Genetics selection evolution (Paris) Vol. 48; no. 1; p. 61
• Main Authors: Vandenplas, Jérémie, Calus, Mario P L, Sevillano, Claudia A, Windig, Jack J, Bastiaansen, John W M
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: France BioMed Central Ltd 22-08-2016; BioMed Central
• Subjects: Alleles; Allelomorphism; Animal breeding; Animal Breeding & Genomics; Animal Breeding and Genetics; Animal Breeding and Genomics; Animal production; Animals; Breeding; Chromosomes; Computer Simulation; Cross-breeding; Datasets; Environmental conditions; Epistasis; Female; Females; Fokkerij & Genomica; Fokkerij en Genetica; Fokkerij en Genomica; Gene mapping; Genetic aspects; Genomes; Genomics - methods; Genotype; Genotype & phenotype; Genotype-environment interactions; Genotypes; Haplotypes; Hybridization, Genetic; Leerstoelgroep Fokkerij en genetica; Life Sciences; Linkage Disequilibrium; Livestock - genetics; LR - Animal Breeding & Genomics; LR - Genomica; Male; Males; Models, Genetic; Nucleotides; Pedigree; Performance evaluation; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; Population; Properties; Quantitative Trait Loci; Single nucleotide polymorphisms; Single-nucleotide polymorphism; Sus scrofa - genetics; WIAS
• ISSN: 1297-9686; 0999-193X; 1297-9686
• DOI: 10.1186/s12711-016-0240-y

For some species, animal production systems are based on the use of crossbreeding to take advantage of the increased performance of crossbred compared to purebred animals. Effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) may differ between purebred and crossbred animals for several reasons: (1) differences in linkage disequilibrium between SNP alleles and a quantitative trait locus; (2) differences in genetic backgrounds (e.g., dominance and epistatic interactions); and (3) differences in environmental conditions, which result in genotype-by-environment interactions. Thus, SNP effects may be breed-specific, which has led to the development of genomic evaluations for crossbred performance that take such effects into account. However, to estimate breed-specific effects, it is necessary to know breed origin of alleles in crossbred animals. Therefore, our aim was to develop an approach for assigning breed origin to alleles of crossbred animals (termed BOA) without information on pedigree and to study its accuracy by considering various factors, including distance between breeds.
The BOA approach consists of: (1) phasing genotypes of purebred and crossbred animals; (2) assigning breed origin to phased haplotypes; and (3) assigning breed origin to alleles of crossbred animals based on a library of assigned haplotypes, the breed composition of crossbred animals, and their SNP genotypes. The accuracy of allele assignments was determined for simulated datasets that include crosses between closely-related, distantly-related and unrelated breeds. Across these scenarios, the percentage of alleles of a crossbred animal that were correctly assigned to their breed origin was greater than 90 %, and increased with increasing distance between breeds, while the percentage of incorrectly assigned alleles was always less than 2 %. For the remaining alleles, i.e. 0 to 10 % of all alleles of a crossbred animal, breed origin could not be assigned.
The BOA approach accurately assigns breed origin to alleles of crossbred animals, even if their pedigree is not recorded.