For Fun, Love, or Money: What Drives Workaholic, Engaged, and Burned-Out Employees at Work?

• Published in: Applied psychology Vol. 61; no. 1; pp. 30 - 55
• Main Authors: van Beek, Ilona, Hu, Qiao, Schaufeli, Wilmar B., Taris, Toon W., Schreurs, Bert H.J.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01-01-2012; Blackwell
• Subjects: Biological and medical sciences; Burnout; Doctors; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Motivation; Motivation. Job satisfaction. Attitude; Occupational psychology; Occupational stress; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry; Psychology. Psychophysiology; Regulation; Selfdetermination; Studies; Wellbeing; Work life balance; Workaholism; China; Human; Affect affectivity; Money; Employee; Motivation; Work; Well being; Occupational burnout
• ISSN: 0269-994X; 1464-0597
• DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2011.00454.x

Previous research has distinguished between two types of working hard: workaholism, a “bad” type of working hard, and work engagement, a “good” type of working hard. However, the motivations underlying workaholism and work engagement have not been examined extensively. Building on Deci and Ryan's Self‐Determination Theory, the present study examined the motivational correlates of workaholism, work engagement, and burnout (a possible consequence of working hard), using data from Chinese health care professionals (544 nurses and 216 physicians), and controlling for job demands and resources. As expected, structural equation modeling revealed that high levels of workaholism were associated with high levels of introjected regulation and identified regulation; that high levels of work engagement were mainly associated with high levels of intrinsic regulation; and that high levels of burnout were mainly associated with low levels of intrinsic regulation. Thus, different types of motivational regulation are associated with different types of job‐related well‐being.