Bird conservation status and cultural values in Indigenous Mexican communities: towards a bioculturally informed conservation policy

• Published in: Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine Vol. 18; no. 1; pp. 1 - 69
• Main Authors: Alcántara-Salinas, Graciela, Hunn, Eugene S, Ibáéez-Bravo, María Elena, Aldasoro-Maya, Elda Miriam, Flores-Hernández, Noé, Pérez-Sato, Juan Antonio, Real-Luna, Natalia, Trujillo, Rafael Arturo Muéoz-Márquez, Lope-Alzina, Diana, Rivera-Hernández, Jaime Ernesto
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London BioMed Central Ltd 02-12-2022; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Analysis; Avifauna; Beliefs, opinions and attitudes; Biocultural conservation policies; Biodiversity; Birds; Birds, Protection of; Classification; Conservation; Conservation status; Cultural values; Cultural values of birds; Environmental aspects; Environmental policy; Ethnobiology; Ethnoornithology; Indigenous animals; Indigenous peoples; Language; Mexican Indigenous communities; Multiculturalism & pluralism; Names; Nomenclatural recognition; Ornithology; Public policy; Refugia; Social aspects; Taxonomy; Threatened species; Mexico
• ISSN: 1746-4269; 1746-4269
• DOI: 10.1186/s13002-022-00567-z

We summarize comparative ethnoornithological data for ten Mexican Indigenous communities, an initial step towards a comprehensive archive of the avian diversity conserved within Mexico's Indigenous territories. We do so by counting highlighted species listed for bird conservation status on widely recognized "red lists" and their cultural value to build biocultural policies in Mexico for their conservation. Indigenous bird names for each study site were determined to allow calculation of the "Scientific Species Recognition Ratio" (SSRR) for high cultural value birds obtained across communities. This demonstrated patterns of cultural prominence. A matrix of 1275 bird versus seven biocultural values was analysed using a correspondence analysis (InfoStat/L-v2020) to illustrate patterns of concordance between bird conservation status and cultural values. This paper contributes to quantitative and qualitative data on the role of ethnoornithology and ethnobiology in biocultural conservation. The areas studied provide refugia for almost 70% of the Mexican avifauna within a fraction of 1% of the national territory, that is 769 bird species recorded for all communities. The global correspondence of regions of biological and linguistic megadiversity is well established, while linguistic diversity is widely accepted as a good proxy for general cultural diversity. Our correspondence analysis explained 81.55% of the variation, indicating a strong relation between cultural importance and bird conservation status. We propose three main categories to establish a bioculturally informed public policy in Mexico for the conservation of what we described as high, medium, and bioculturally prominent bird species all include cultural value in any material or symbolic aspect. High are those species appearing on any threatened list, but also considered in any endemic status, while medium include threatened listed species. The last category included species not necessarily listed on any threat list, but with a wide range of social and cultural uses. We suggest that the concept might be extended to other species of biocultural importance. We argue that bird conservation policies should be biocultural, that is they should recognize birds of cultural value on a par with bird species "of special interest" because they are most critical for biodiversity conservation. The desire of local people to protect their traditional community lands and livelihoods can be an effective biodiversity conservation strategy, which should be recognized in national biocultural policies.