Movement kinematic and postural control differences when performing a visuomotor skill in real and virtual environments

• Published in: Experimental brain research Vol. 241; no. 7; pp. 1797 - 1810
• Main Authors: Brock, K., Vine, S. J., Ross, J. M., Trevarthen, M., Harris, D. J.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01-07-2023; Springer; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Analysis; Balance; Biomechanical Phenomena; Biomedical and Life Sciences; Biomedicine; Brain research; Feedback; Grasping; Haptics; Humans; Kinematics; Learning; Motor skill learning; Motor task performance; Movement; Neurology; Neurosciences; Postural Balance; Posture; Rehabilitation; Research Article; Sensorimotor integration; Sensorimotor system; Skills; Transfer learning; Virtual Reality; United Kingdom; Golf; Motor control; Mixed reality; Virtual reality
• ISSN: 0014-4819; 1432-1106
• DOI: 10.1007/s00221-023-06639-0

Immersive technologies, like virtual and mixed reality, pose a novel challenge for our sensorimotor systems as they deliver simulated sensory inputs that may not match those of the natural environment. These include reduced fields of view, missing or inaccurate haptic information, and distortions of 3D space; differences that may impact the control of motor actions. For instance, reach-to-grasp movements without end-point haptic feedback are characterised by slower and more exaggerated movements. A general uncertainty about sensory input may also induce a more conscious form of movement control. We tested whether a more complex skill like golf putting was also characterized by more consciously controlled movement. In a repeated-measures design, kinematics of the putter swing and postural control were compared between (i) real-world putting, (ii) VR putting, and (iii) VR putting with haptic feedback from a real ball (i.e., mixed reality). Differences in putter swing were observed both between the real world and VR, and between VR conditions with and without haptic information. Further, clear differences in postural control emerged between real and virtual putting, with both VR conditions characterised by larger postural movements, which were more regular and less complex, suggesting a more conscious form of balance control. Conversely, participants actually reported less conscious awareness of their movements in VR. These findings highlight how fundamental movement differences may exist between virtual and natural environments, which may pose challenges for transfer of learning within applications to motor rehabilitation and sport.