Creating legitimacy in global private governance: The case of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil

This article suggests that understanding legitimization processes of private governance initiatives requires a multi-dimensional approach. This suggestion has been operationalized in three aspects that can be used to better understand such processes: legality, moral justifications, and consent/accep...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ecological economics Vol. 70; no. 11; pp. 1891 - 1899
Main Authors: Schouten, Greetje, Glasbergen, Pieter
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier B.V 15-09-2011
Elsevier
Series:Ecological Economics
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This article suggests that understanding legitimization processes of private governance initiatives requires a multi-dimensional approach. This suggestion has been operationalized in three aspects that can be used to better understand such processes: legality, moral justifications, and consent/acceptance. These aspects are based on different theoretical traditions and are applied in an analysis of the process of creating legitimacy of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO). This empirical research reveals the characteristics of the legitimization process of the RSPO and shows the value of a multi-dimensional approach. The three perspectives complement each other and deepen our insights in legitimization processes by revealing tensions and trade-offs in the different ways in which non-state market driven governance arrangements can create legitimacy. ► Understanding legitimization of private governance requires a multi-dimensional approach. ► These dimensions include: legality, moral justifications, and consent/acceptance. ► This is applied to the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO). ► Tensions and trade-offs are revealed in the different ways in which the RSPO can create legitimacy.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0921-8009
1873-6106
DOI:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.03.012