Efficacy evaluation of retrospectively applying the Varian normal breathing predictive filter for volume definition and artifact reduction in 4D CT lung patients

• Published in: Journal of applied clinical medical physics Vol. 15; no. 3; pp. 14 - 24
• Main Authors: Malone, Ciaran, Rock, Luke, Skourou, Christina
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01-05-2014; John Wiley and Sons Inc
• Subjects: 4D CT; Algorithms; breathing irregularities; Humans; Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods; Lung; Lung cancer; Lung Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging; Methods; normal breathing predictive filter; Patients; Radiation Oncology Physics; Radiographic Image Enhancement - methods; Reproducibility of Results; Respiratory Mechanics; Respiratory-Gated Imaging Techniques - methods; Retrospective Studies; Sensitivity and Specificity; Simulation; Software; Software Design; Solitary Pulmonary Nodule - diagnostic imaging; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods; Tumors; Varian RPM
• ISSN: 1526-9914; 1526-9914
• DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v15i3.4315

Phase‐based sorting of four‐dimensional computed tomography (4D CT) datasets is prone to image artifacts due to patient's breathing irregularities that occur during the image acquisition. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of the Varian normal breathing predictive filter (NBPF) as a retrospective phase‐sorting parameter in 4D CT. Ten 4D CT lung cancer datasets were obtained. The volumes of all tumors present, as well as the total lung volume, were calculated on the maximum intensity projection (MIP) images as well as each individual phase image. The NBPF was varied retrospectively within the available range, and changes in volume and image quality were recorded. The patients' breathing trace was analysed and the magnitude and location of any breathing irregularities were correlated to the behavior of the NBPF. The NBPF was found to have a considerable effect on the quality of the images in MIP and single‐phase datasets. When used appropriately, the NBPF is shown to have the ability to account for and correct image artifacts. However, when turned off (0%) or set above a critical level (approximately 40%), it resulted in erroneous volume reconstructions with variations in tumor volume up to 26.6%. Those phases associated with peak inspiration were found to be more susceptible to changes in the NBPF. The NBPF settings selected prior to exporting the breathing trace for patients evaluated using 4D CT directly affect the accuracy of the targeting and volume estimation of lung tumors. Recommendations are made to address potential errors in patient anatomy introduced by breathing irregularities, specifically deep breath or cough irregularities, by implementing the proper settings and use of this tool.
PACS numbers: 87.57.Q‐, 87.57.C‐, 87.57.N‐, 87.57.nf, 87.55.D‐.