Legislative Activity and Gridlock in the European Union

• Published in: British journal of political science Vol. 45; no. 3; pp. 477 - 499
• Main Authors: Crombez, Christophe, Hix, Simon
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press 01-07-2015
• Subjects: Councils; Decision making; European Union; Game theory; Gridlock (Politics); Legislation; Legislative Bodies; Legislative Process; Majorities; Policy Making; Political science; Political systems; Politics; Reforms; United States of America; Voting; Europe
• ISSN: 0007-1234; 1469-2112
• DOI: 10.1017/S0007123413000380

This article develops a game-theoretical model of European Union (EU) policy making that suggests that the amount of legislative activity depends on the size of the gridlock interval. This is consistent with Krehbiel's study of US politics. This interval depends on two factors: (1) the preference configuration of the political actors and (2) the legislative procedures used in a particular period. Actors’ preferences and procedures are not expected to have any effect beyond their impact on the gridlock interval. The study predicts smaller gridlock intervals, and thus more legislative activity, under the co-decision (consultation) procedure when the pivotal member states and the European Parliament (Commission) are closer to each other. More activity is expected under qualified majority voting in the Council than under unanimity. The results find support for these propositions in an empirical analysis of EU legislative activity between 1979 and 2009.