Towards standardised evaluative measurement of nature impacts: two spatial planning case studies for major Dutch lakes

In the assessment of complex spatial planning projects, the ecological impacts and socio-economic impacts are fundamental to the evaluation. The measurements of ecological impacts of spatial plans have to be integrated in a standardised way. In the present paper, we analyse two Dutch case studies an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Environmental science and pollution research international Vol. 22; no. 4; pp. 2467 - 2478
Main Authors: van Puijenbroek, P. J. T. M, Sijtsma, F. J, Wortelboer, F. G, Ligtvoet, W, Maarse, M
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Berlin/Heidelberg Springer-Verlag 01-02-2015
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In the assessment of complex spatial planning projects, the ecological impacts and socio-economic impacts are fundamental to the evaluation. The measurements of ecological impacts of spatial plans have to be integrated in a standardised way. In the present paper, we analyse two Dutch case studies and apply the standardised Threat-Weighted Ecological Quality Area measurement. This measurement is developed to evaluate projects with terrestrial impacts but has not yet been applied for water evaluations. We aim to show how the use of a common measurement tool incorporates both ecological quality and degree of threat on criteria in the EU Water Framework Directive and Nature 2000. The measurements discussed here derive from two cases of cost–benefit analysis: The first case is the Markermeer, the second largest lake of The Netherlands, and a study on water quality improvement and nature restoration; an artificial island will also be the setting for a new residential area. The second case study is on water level management carried out on the IJsselmeer, the largest lake in the country. Results of our analysis show the potential impacts with a standardised method to the spatial distribution and quality of the ecosystems.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-2910-z
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues
ISSN:0944-1344
1614-7499
DOI:10.1007/s11356-014-2910-z