Socioeconomic status and subjective well-being: The mediating role of class identity and social activities

• Published in: PloS one Vol. 18; no. 9; p. e0291325
• Main Authors: Wang, Baoqin, Zhao, Hang, Shen, Hao, Jiang, Yi
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: San Francisco Public Library of Science 15-09-2023; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subjects: Analysis; Biology and Life Sciences; Class identity; Conduct of life; Correlation analysis; Cultural capital; Economic aspects; Education; Ethics; Ethnicity; Evaluation; Health aspects; Influence; Likert scale; Mediation; Medicine and Health Sciences; Mental health; Participation; Policy making; Psychological aspects; Psychological factors; Social activities; Social aspects; Social classes; Social identity; Social networks; Social participation; Social Sciences; Social status; Social support; Socioeconomic factors; Socioeconomic status; Socioeconomics; Statistical methods; Stress; Surveys; Variables; Well being; China
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291325

Subjective well-being has a significant impact on an individual's physical and mental health. Socioeconomic status, class identity, and social activity participation play important roles in subjective well-being. Therefore, the aim of this study was to uncover the mechanisms through which these factors influence subjective well-being. A total of 1926 valid samples were recruited using the Chinese General Social Survey 2021 (CGSS 2021). The Chinese Citizen's Subjective Well-Being Scale (SWBS-CC) was employed to assess subjective well-being. Socioeconomic status was measured using income and education, and class identity and social activity participation were measured using Likert scales. Pearson correlation analysis and the chain mediation model were conducted to explore the relationship between these factors. Finally, the Bootstrap method was used to examine the path coefficients. A significant correlation was found between socioeconomic status, class identity, social activity, and subjective well-being (p < 0.01). The indirect effect of socioeconomic status on subjective well-being mediated by class identity was 0.351 (95% CI: 0.721, 1.587), while the indirect effect of socioeconomic status on subjective well-being mediated by social activity was 0.380 (95% CI: 0.059, 0.240). The effect mediated by both class status and social activities was 0.011 (95% CI: 0.010, 0.093). The study showed that socioeconomic status, class identity, and social activity had significant effects on subjective well-being. Class identity and social activity partially mediated the effects of socioeconomic status on subjective well-being, and they had a chain mediating effect between socioeconomic status and subjective well-being. Therefore, policymakers have the opportunity to enhance subjective well-being in lower socioeconomic status groups by promoting individual class identity and encouraging greater social activity participation.