A phase I dose-escalation study of eribulin and S-1 for metastatic breast cancer

Background: We evaluated the safety, maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics, recommended dose for phase II (P2RD), and preliminary anticancer activity of a combination eribulin and S-1 therapeutic in metastatic breast cancer patients pretreated with anthracycline and taxane. Method: Patients...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:British journal of cancer Vol. 112; no. 5; pp. 819 - 824
Main Authors: Sakiyama, T, Tsurutani, J, Iwasa, T, Kawakami, H, Nonagase, Y, Yoshida, T, Tanaka, K, Fujisaka, Y, Kurata, T, Komoike, Y, Nishio, K, Nakagawa, K
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: London Nature Publishing Group UK 03-03-2015
Nature Publishing Group
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background: We evaluated the safety, maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics, recommended dose for phase II (P2RD), and preliminary anticancer activity of a combination eribulin and S-1 therapeutic in metastatic breast cancer patients pretreated with anthracycline and taxane. Method: Patients aged 20–74 years were recruited. In level 1, patients received S-1 (65 mg m −2 ) from day 1 to 14, and eribulin (1.1 mg m −2 ) on day 1 and 8 in a 21-day cycle. In level 2, eribulin was increased to 1.4 mg m −2 . In level 3, S-1 was increased to 80 mg m −2 . Results: Twelve patients were enrolled into three cohorts. Planned dose escalation was completed, with one case exhibiting dose-limiting toxicity (grade 3 hypokalaemia) at level 3, without reaching the MTD. The P2RD was determined to be level 2 (eribulin 1.4 mg m −2 and S-1 65 mg m −2 ). The most common grade 3 or 4 toxicity was neutropenia (83.3%), followed by febrile neutropenia (25.0%). Five of eleven patients (41.7%) with measurable disease had a partial response. Pharmacokinetics were characterised by dose-dependent elimination and nonlinear exposure. Conclusion: Dose level 3 was not tolerated owing to febrile neutropenia development. Thus, intermediate dose level 2 was recommended for further evaluation. Preliminary antitumour activity warrants further investigation in this setting.
ISSN:0007-0920
1532-1827
DOI:10.1038/bjc.2015.10