The significance of bicuspid aortic valve after surgery for acute type A aortic dissection

Decision-making concerning the extent of the repair of acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) includes functional and anatomical assessment of the aortic valve. We hypothesized that bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) does not impact outcome after surgery for ATAAD. We therefore evaluated the outcome after...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery Vol. 159; no. 3; pp. 760 - 767.e3
Main Authors: Mennander, Ari, Olsson, Christian, Jeppsson, Anders, Geirsson, Arnar, Hjortdal, Vibeke, Hansson, Emma C., Jarvela, Kati, Nozohoor, Shahab, Gunn, Jarmo, Ahlsson, Anders, Gudbjartsson, Tomas
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01-03-2020
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Decision-making concerning the extent of the repair of acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) includes functional and anatomical assessment of the aortic valve. We hypothesized that bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) does not impact outcome after surgery for ATAAD. We therefore evaluated the outcome after ATAAD surgery in relation to the presence of BAV, acute aortic regurgitation (AR), and surgical approach, using the Nordic Consortium for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection database. Eight participating Nordic centers collected data from 1122 patients undergoing ATAAD surgery during the years 2005 to 2014. Early complications, reoperations and survival were compared between patients with BAV and tricuspid aortic valves (TAV) before and after propensity score matching for sex, age, AR, organ malperfusion, hemodynamic instability, and site of the tear. Mean follow-up (range) for patients with TAV and BAV was 3.1 years (0-10.4 years) and 3.2 years (0-9.0 years), respectively. Altogether, 65 (5.8%) of the patients had BAV. Root replacement was more frequently performed in the BAV as compared with the TAV group (60% vs 23%, P < .001). Survival, however, did not differ significantly between patients with BAV or TAV, either before (P = .230) or after propensity score-matching (P = .812). Even so, in cohort as a whole, patients presenting with AR had less favorable survival. Early and mid-term survival did not differ significantly between patients with BAV and TAV. Propensity score−matched analysis was performed on 1122 patients undergoing surgery for acute type A aortic dissection. Mid-term survival did not differ significantly between 65 bicuspid aortic valve (BAV, blue line) and 260 tricuspid aortic valve (TAV, red line) patients. [Display omitted]
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-2
ISSN:0022-5223
1097-685X
1097-685X
DOI:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.03.012