Quality of routine health data at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in Ethiopia, Haiti, Laos, Nepal, and South Africa

• Published in: Population health metrics Vol. 21; no. 1; p. 7
• Main Authors: Ayele, Wondimu, Gage, Anna, Kapoor, Neena R, Kassahun Gelaw, Solomon, Hensman, Dilipkumar, Derseh Mebratie, Anagaw, Nega, Adiam, Asai, Daisuke, Molla, Gebeyaw, Mehata, Suresh, Mthethwa, Londiwe, Mfeka-Nkabinde, Nompumelelo Gloria, Joseph, Jean Paul, Pierre, Daniella Myriam, Thermidor, Roody, Arsenault, Catherine
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 20-05-2023; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Analysis; Births; Cesarean Section; Completeness; Consistency; Control; COVID-19; COVID-19 - epidemiology; COVID-19 vaccines; Data quality; DHIS2; Epidemics; Ethiopia; Evaluation; Female; Haiti; Haiti - epidemiology; Health; Health facilities; Health management information systems; Health services; Humans; Immunization; Indicators; Infectious diseases; Information management; Information systems; Laos; Laos - epidemiology; Maternal & child health; Medical care; Medical records; Nepal; Nepal - epidemiology; Outliers (statistics); Pandemics; Population; Pregnancy; Public health administration; Public sector; Quality assessment; Quality management; Rotavirus; South Africa; South Africa - epidemiology; Standard deviation; Vaccines; Viruses; Haiti; South Africa; Laos; Nepal; Ethiopia; COVID-19; Data quality; DHIS2; Health management information systems
• ISSN: 1478-7954; 1478-7954
• DOI: 10.1186/s12963-023-00306-w

During the COVID-19 pandemic, governments and researchers have used routine health data to estimate potential declines in the delivery and uptake of essential health services. This research relies on the data being high quality and, crucially, on the data quality not changing because of the pandemic. In this paper, we investigated those assumptions and assessed data quality before and during COVID-19.
We obtained routine health data from the DHIS2 platforms in Ethiopia, Haiti, Lao People's Democratic Republic, Nepal, and South Africa (KwaZulu-Natal province) for a range of 40 indicators on essential health services and institutional deaths. We extracted data over 24 months (January 2019-December 2020) including pre-pandemic data and the first 9 months of the pandemic. We assessed four dimensions of data quality: reporting completeness, presence of outliers, internal consistency, and external consistency.
We found high reporting completeness across countries and services and few declines in reporting at the onset of the pandemic. Positive outliers represented fewer than 1% of facility-month observations across services. Assessment of internal consistency across vaccine indicators found similar reporting of vaccines in all countries. Comparing cesarean section rates in the HMIS to those from population-representative surveys, we found high external consistency in all countries analyzed.
While efforts remain to improve the quality of these data, our results show that several indicators in the HMIS can be reliably used to monitor service provision over time in these five countries.