Parental feeding practices as a response to child appetitive traits in toddlerhood and early childhood: a discordant twin analysis of the Gemini cohort

• Published in: The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity Vol. 20; no. 1; pp. 39 - 11
• Main Authors: Kininmonth, Alice R, Herle, Moritz, Tommerup, Kristiane, Haycraft, Emma, Farrow, Claire, Croker, Helen, Pickard, Abigail, Edwards, Katie, Blissett, Jacqueline, Llewellyn, Clare
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 04-04-2023; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Adolescent; Analysis; Appetite; Appetite - physiology; Child; Child Behavior - psychology; Child, Preschool; Discordance; Discordant twin; Eating behavior; Eating behaviour; Emotions; Feeding Behavior - psychology; Food habits; Health aspects; Humans; Lifetime; Parental influences; Parenting; Parents; Satiation; Sibling; Siblings; Surveys and Questionnaires; Toddler; Twins; United Kingdom; Feeding practices; Discordance; Eating behaviour; Sibling; Toddler; Child; Discordant twin
• ISSN: 1479-5868; 1479-5868
• DOI: 10.1186/s12966-023-01440-2

Parental feeding practices (PFPs) have been implicated in the development of children's eating behaviours. However, evidence suggests that feeding practices may also develop in response to their child's weight or emerging appetitive traits. We used the twin design to test the hypothesis that parents develop their feeding practices partly in response to their child's appetite.
Data were from Gemini, a population-based cohort of 2402 British families with twins born in 2007. Psychometric measures of PFPs and appetite were completed by parents when their twins were 16-months and 5-years. Within-family analyses including all twins with available data in the sample (n = 1010-1858 pairs), examined if within-pair differences in PFPs were associated with differences in appetitive traits, controlling for differences in birth weight-SDS, early feeding method and child sex. In a subsample of twin pairs who were considerably discordant for appetitive traits by ≥ 1SD (n = 122-544 pairs), the direction and magnitude of within-pair differences in feeding practices was explored.
Within-family variation in parental feeding practices in toddlerhood and early childhood was low (discordance ranged from 0.1 to 6% of the sample), except for pressure to eat (toddlerhood: 19%; early childhood: 32%). Within-pair differences in all appetitive traits were associated with differential use of 'pressure to eat' at both 16-months and 5-years. In the subsample of twins most discordant for appetitive traits, parents used more pressure with the twin expressing lower food responsiveness, lower emotional overeating, lower food enjoyment, higher satiety responsiveness, slower speed of eating, higher emotional undereating and greater fussiness in toddlerhood and early childhood (p-values < 0.001). Effect sizes were small to large at 16-months (η
=0.02-0.09) and 5-years (η
=0.05-0.21).
Parents rarely varied their feeding practices between twins in toddlerhood and early childhood, except for pressure. Parents exerted greater pressure on their twin who expressed a poorer appetite compared to their co-twin, suggesting that parents develop a pressuring feeding style when their child expresses a poorer appetite or lower interest in, and enthusiasm for, eating. These findings could be used to guide interventions seeking to support parents in feeding their children in a way that nurtures the development of healthy eating behaviours.