Experiences of a new cadre of midwives in Bangladesh: findings from a mixed method study

• Published in: Human resources for health Vol. 18; no. 1; pp. 73 - 12
• Main Authors: Zaman, Rashid U, Khaled, Adiba, Sabur, Muhammod Abdus, Islam, Shahidul, Ahmed, Shehlina, Varghese, Joe, Sherratt, Della, Witter, Sophie
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 06-10-2020; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Analysis; Attended births; Bangladesh; Community health care; Curricula; Data collection; Design; Ethics; Families & family life; Family planning; Female; Focus Groups; Follow-Up Studies; Foreign exchange rates; Health facilities; Health services; Health systems; Health workforce; Humans; Interviews; Maternal & child health; Methods; Midwifery; Midwifery education; Midwives; Mixed methods research; Population; Pregnancy; Public sector; Skills; Surveys and Questionnaires; Womens health; Bangladesh; Midwives; Health systems; Bangladesh; Health workforce
• ISSN: 1478-4491; 1478-4491
• DOI: 10.1186/s12960-020-00505-8

Bangladesh did not have dedicated professional midwives in public sector health facilities until recently, when the country started a nation-wide programme to educate and deploy diploma midwives. The objective of the findings presented in this paper, which is part of a larger study, was to better understand the experience of the midwives of their education programme and first posting as a qualified midwife and to assess their midwifery knowledge and skills.
We applied a mixed method approach, which included interviewing 329 midwives and conducting 6 focus group discussions with 43 midwives and midwifery students. Sampling weights were used to generate representative statistics for the entire cohort of the midwives deployed in the public sector health facilities.
Most of the midwives were satisfied with different dimensions of their education programme, with the exception of the level of exposure they had to the rural communities during their programme. Out of 329 midwives, 50% received tuition fee waivers, while 46% received funding for educational materials and 40% received free accommodation. The satisfaction with the various aspects of the current posting was high and nearly all midwives reported that a desire to work in the public sector in the long run. However, a significant proportion of the midwives expressed concerns with equipment, accommodation, transport and prospect of transfers. The scores on the knowledge test and self-reported skill levels were varied but reasonably high.
While the midwives are highly motivated, satisfied with many aspects of their current jobs and have adequate knowledge and skills, there are some bottlenecks and concerns that, if unaddressed, may derail the success of this programme. To capture the career progress of these midwives, additional research, including a follow-up study with the same cohort of midwives, would be beneficial to this programme.