Making the decision to donate eyes: Perspectives from the families of the deceased in Madurai, India

• Published in: Indian journal of ophthalmology Vol. 68; no. 10; pp. 2094 - 2098
• Main Authors: Subburaman, Ganesh-Babu B, Kempen, John, Durairaj, Saravanan, Balakrishnan, Vijayakumar, Valaguru, Vijayakumar, Namperumalsamy, Venkatesh, Thulasiraj, Ravilla, Gupta, Sachin
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: India Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd 01-10-2020; Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd; Medknow Publications & Media Pvt. Ltd; Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
• Subjects: Case-Control Studies; Decision Making; Donations; Eye surgery; Family; Forecasts and trends; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; Humans; India; Original; Surveys and Questionnaires; Tissue and Organ Procurement; Tissue donation; Tissue Donors; India; Attitudes; eye donations; case-control study; corneal transplantation
• ISSN: 0301-4738; 1998-3689
• DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_2324_19

Purpose: To identify factors affecting family members' decision whether to donate eye organs. Methods: A community-based case-control study based on in-home interviews with families of deceased individuals who had or had not donated eye organs, in Madurai district, Tamil Nadu, India. Data collected were knowledge and awareness of eye donations, whether the deceased individual had expressed or pledged willingness to donate, and family members' attitudes and willingness to donate their own eye organs. Results: Seventy-six families of donors and 256 families of non-donors completed the survey. Multivariable analysis showed that the following variables were significantly associated with a donation: age, whether the deceased had registered for eye donation, pre-expressed willingness of deceased to donate, whether family members personally know beneficiaries of eye donations, and higher score on a scale evaluating knowledge and awareness about eye donation. The majority of donors' families (71%) had been encouraged by someone to donate. Among non-donor families, a substantially larger fraction (52.8%) indicated they would have donated had someone reminded or encouraged them to do so, in comparison with those who indicated lack of awareness or knowledge (14.5%). Conclusion: Community programs are likely to be effective if they encourage individuals to pledge their eyes or express their willingness to donate their eyes to family members in advance of death; they increase public awareness of the value of eye donation. A friend, family member, neighbor or counselor approaching bereaved families and having a dialogue about eye donation would substantially increase the probability of a decision to donate.