Quality of Care Provided by a Comprehensive Dementia Care Comanagement Program

Multiple studies have shown that quality of care for dementia in primary care is poor, with physician adherence to dementia quality indicators (QIs) ranging from 18% to 42%. In response, the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) Health System created the UCLA Alzheimer's and Dementia C...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) Vol. 64; no. 8; pp. 1724 - 1730
Main Authors: Jennings, Lee A., Tan, Zaldy, Wenger, Neil S., Cook, Erin A., Han, Weijuan, McCreath, Heather E., Serrano, Katherine S., Roth, Carol P., Reuben, David B.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01-08-2016
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Multiple studies have shown that quality of care for dementia in primary care is poor, with physician adherence to dementia quality indicators (QIs) ranging from 18% to 42%. In response, the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) Health System created the UCLA Alzheimer's and Dementia Care (ADC) Program, a quality improvement program that uses a comanagement model with nurse practitioner dementia care managers (DCM) working with primary care physicians and community‐based organizations to provide comprehensive dementia care. The objective was to measure the quality of dementia care that nurse practitioner DCMs provide using the Assessing Care of Vulnerable Elders (ACOVE‐3) and Physician Consortium for Performance Improvement QIs. Participants included 797 community‐dwelling adults with dementia referred to the UCLA ADC program over a 2‐year period. UCLA is an urban academic medical center with primarily fee‐for‐service reimbursement. The percentage of recommended care received for 17 dementia QIs was measured. The primary outcome was aggregate quality of care for the UCLA ADC cohort, calculated as the total number of recommended care processes received divided by the total number of eligible quality indicators. Secondary outcomes included aggregate quality of care in three domains of dementia care: assessment and screening (7 QIs), treatment (6 QIs), and counseling (4 QIs). QIs were ed from DCM notes over a 3‐month period from date of initial assessment. Individuals were eligible for 9,895 QIs, of which 92% were passed. Overall pass rates of DCMs were similar (90–96%). All counseling and assessment QIs had pass rates greater than 80%, with most exceeding 90%. Wider variation in adherence was found among QIs addressing treatments for dementia, which patient‐specific criteria triggered, ranging from 27% for discontinuation of medications associated with mental status changes to 86% for discussion about acetylcholinesterase inhibitors. Comprehensive dementia care comanagement with a nurse practitioner can result in high quality of care for dementia, especially for assessment, screening, and counseling. The effect on treatment QIs is more variable but higher than previous reports of physician‐provided dementia care.
Bibliography:National Institutes of Health National Center for Advancing Translational Science UCLA Clinical and Translational Science Institute - No. UL1TR000124
istex:4A945C56FC6A77FF986CEDA132FDFB66EED2908A
National Institute on Aging - No. 5P30AG028748
John A. Hartford Foundation
ark:/67375/WNG-8QBP7JBQ-K
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services - No. 1C1CMS330982-01-00
ArticleID:JGS14251
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0002-8614
1532-5415
DOI:10.1111/jgs.14251