The Efficacy of Mobile Phone Apps for Lifestyle Modification in Diabetes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

• Published in: JMIR mHealth and uHealth Vol. 7; no. 1; p. e12297
• Main Authors: Wu, Xinghan, Guo, Xitong, Zhang, Zhiwei
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Canada JMIR Publications 15-01-2019
• Subjects: Bias; Body mass index; Cellular telephones; Collaboration; Diabetes; Diabetes Mellitus - prevention & control; Diabetes Mellitus - psychology; Exercise; Health Promotion - methods; Health Promotion - standards; Humans; Intervention; Lifestyles; Meta-analysis; Mobile Applications - standards; Mobile Applications - trends; Multimedia; Nutrition research; Review; Risk Reduction Behavior; Self Care - methods; Software reviews; Standard deviation; Systematic review; smartphone; behavior therapy; mobile applications; diabetes mellitus; diet; lifestyle; physical activity
• ISSN: 2291-5222; 2291-5222
• DOI: 10.2196/12297

Diabetes and related complications are estimated to cost US $727 billion worldwide annually. Type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes, and gestational diabetes are three subtypes of diabetes that share the same behavioral risk factors. Efforts in lifestyle modification, such as daily physical activity and healthy diets, can reduce the risk of prediabetes, improve the health levels of people with diabetes, and prevent complications. Lifestyle modification is commonly performed in a face-to-face interaction, which can prove costly. Mobile phone apps provide a more accessible platform for lifestyle modification in diabetes.
This review aimed to summarize and synthesize the clinical evidence of the efficacy of mobile phone apps for lifestyle modification in different subtypes of diabetes.
In June 2018, we conducted a literature search in 5 databases (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and PsycINFO). We evaluated the studies that passed screening using The Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool. We conducted a meta-analysis for each subtype on the mean difference (between intervention and control groups) at the posttreatment glycated hemoglobin (HbA
) level. Where possible, we analyzed subgroups for short-term (3-6 months) and long-term (9-12 months) studies. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I
statistic.
We identified total of 2669 articles through database searching. After the screening, we included 26 articles (23 studies) in the systematic review, of which 18 studies (5 type 1 diabetes, 11 type 2 diabetes, and 2 prediabetes studies) were eligible for meta-analysis. For type 1 diabetes, the overall effect on HbA
was statistically insignificant (P=.46) with acceptable heterogeneity (I
=39%) in the short-term subgroup (4 studies) and significant heterogeneity between the short-term and long-term subgroups (I
=64%). Regarding type 2 diabetes, the overall effect on HbA
was statistically significant (P<.01) in both subgroups, and when the 2 subgroups were combined, there was virtually no heterogeneity within and between the subgroups (I
range 0%-2%). The effect remained statistically significant (P<.01) after adjusting for publication bias using the trim and fill method. For the prediabetes condition, the overall effect on HbA
was statistically insignificant (P=.67) with a large heterogeneity (I
=65%) between the 2 studies.
There is strong evidence for the efficacy of mobile phone apps for lifestyle modification in type 2 diabetes. The evidence is inconclusive for the other diabetes subtypes.