Big Brains, Enhanced Cognition, and Response of Birds to Novel Environments

The widely held hypothesis that enlarged brains have evolved as an adaptation to cope with novel or altered environmental conditions lacks firm empirical support. Here, we test this hypothesis for a major animal group (birds) by examining whether large-brained species show higher survival than small...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS Vol. 102; no. 15; pp. 5460 - 5465
Main Authors: Sol, Daniel, Duncan, Richard P., Blackburn, Tim M., Cassey, Phillip, Lefebvre, Louis, Orians, Gordon H.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States National Academy of Sciences 12-04-2005
National Acad Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The widely held hypothesis that enlarged brains have evolved as an adaptation to cope with novel or altered environmental conditions lacks firm empirical support. Here, we test this hypothesis for a major animal group (birds) by examining whether large-brained species show higher survival than small-brained species when introduced to nonnative locations. Using a global database documenting the outcome of >600 introduction events, we confirm that avian species with larger brains, relative to their body mass, tend to be more successful at establishing themselves in novel environments. Moreover, we provide evidence that larger brains help birds respond to novel conditions by enhancing their innovation propensity rather than indirectly through noncognitive mechanisms. These findings provide strong evidence for the hypothesis that enlarged brains function, and hence may have evolved, to deal with changes in the environment.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
Abbreviations: BS-EC, brain size–environmental change; PIC, phylogenetically independent contrasts.
This paper was submitted directly (Track II) to the PNAS office.
See Commentary on page 5306.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: d.sol@creaf.uab.es.
Edited by Gordon H. Orians, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, and approved February 11, 2005
Author contributions: D.S., R.P.D., T.M.B., P.C., and L.L. designed research; D.S., R.P.D., T.M.B., P.C., and L.L. performed research; D.S. analyzed data; and D.S. wrote the paper.
ISSN:0027-8424
1091-6490
DOI:10.1073/pnas.0408145102