Adoption of the new antimalarial drug policy in Tanzania – a cross‐sectional study in the community

Summary Objective  To assess the diffusion of the change of first line antimalarial drug from chloroquine (CQ) to sulphadoxine/pyrimethamine (SP) at household level in a rural district of Tanzania less than a year after the policy implementation. Methods  Caretakers in 729 households were interviewe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Tropical medicine & international health Vol. 10; no. 10; pp. 1038 - 1046
Main Authors: Eriksen, Jaran, Nsimba, Stephen E. D., Minzi, Omary M. S., Sanga, Anku J., Petzold, Max, Gustafsson, Lars L., Warsame, Marian Y., Tomson, Göran
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Oxford, UK Blackwell Science Ltd 01-10-2005
Blackwell Science
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Summary Objective  To assess the diffusion of the change of first line antimalarial drug from chloroquine (CQ) to sulphadoxine/pyrimethamine (SP) at household level in a rural district of Tanzania less than a year after the policy implementation. Methods  Caretakers in 729 households were interviewed on knowledge of the new policy, home stocking of antimalarials, home‐treatment practices of children younger than 5 years with fever, health‐seeking behaviour and experience of SP. SP and CQ levels in blood were analysed from 328 children younger than 5 years in the households. Twelve focus group discussions (FGD) were performed with mothers, fathers and health workers. Results  About 51% of the population knew that SP was the first line antimalarial. Only 8% of mothers stocked antimalarials, and only 4% stated self‐treatment as the first action. We estimated that 84% of the children who had had fever during the last 4 weeks sought care at public health facilities. SP was detectable in 18% of the total child population and in 32% of those with reported fever, CQ in only 5% and 7%, respectively. The FGDs revealed negative perceptions of SP and fear of severe adverse reactions with mass media reported as key informant. Conclusion  The policy had diffused to the communities in the sense that CQ had been changed to SP, which was well known as first line treatment. Moreover, there was a reported dramatic change from self‐treatment with CQ to seeking care at public health facilities where SP was given under observation.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1360-2276
1365-3156
DOI:10.1111/j.1365-3156.2005.01486.x