Investigating the spread in surface albedo for snow‐covered forests in CMIP5 models

• Published in: Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres Vol. 121; no. 3; pp. 1104 - 1119
• Main Authors: Wang, Libo, Cole, Jason N. S., Bartlett, Paul, Verseghy, Diana, Derksen, Chris, Brown, Ross, Salzen, Knut
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Washington Blackwell Publishing Ltd 16-02-2016
• Subjects: Albedo; Atmospheric models; boreal forest; Boreal forests; climate model; Climate models; CMIP5; Computer simulation; Forests; Geophysics; Leaf area index; Leaves; Meteorology; Parametrization; Polyamide-imides; Sensitivity analysis; Snow; snow cover; surface albedo
• ISSN: 2169-897X; 2169-8996
• DOI: 10.1002/2015JD023824

This study investigates the role of leaf/plant area index (LAI/PAI) specification on the large spread of winter albedo simulated by climate models. To examine the sensitivity of winter albedo to LAI, we perform a sensitivity analysis using two methods commonly used to compute albedo in snow‐covered forests as well as diagnostic calculations within version 4.2 of the Canadian Atmospheric Model for which PAI is systematically varied. The results show that the simulated albedo is very sensitive to negative PAI biases, especially for smaller PAI values. The LAI and surface albedo of boreal forests in the presence of snow simulated by the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) models are evaluated using satellite observations. The evaluation of CMIP5 models suggest that inaccurate tree cover fraction due to improper plant functional type specification or erroneous LAI parameterization in some models explains, in part, an observed positive bias in winter albedo over boreal forest regions of the Northern Hemisphere. This contributes to a large intermodel spread in simulated surface albedo in the presence of snow over these regions and is largely responsible for uncertainties in simulated snow‐albedo feedback strength. Errors are largest (+20–40%) in models with large underestimation of LAI but are typically within ±15% when simulated LAI is within the observed range. This study underscores the importance of accurate representation of vegetation distribution and parameters in realistic simulation of surface albedo.
Key Points
Large spread of winter albedo is linked to spread in simulated leaf area index
Errors in PFT simulation can lead to errors in simulated TCF and LAI
Corrections of underestimation in TCF and LAI will likely limit the albedo bias to ±15%