Mechanical circulatory support for refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a Danish nationwide multicenter study

• Published in: Critical care (London, England) Vol. 25; no. 1; pp. 1 - 174
• Main Authors: Mark, Sivagowry Rasalingam, Stengaard, Carsten, Linde, Louise, Maller, Jacob Eifer, Jensen, Lisette Okkels, Schmidt, Henrik, Riber, Lars Peter, Andreasen, Jo Banding, Thomassen, Sisse Anette, Laugesen, Helle, Freeman, Phillip Michael, Christensen, Steffen, Greisen, Jacob Raben, Tang, Mariann, Maller-Sarensen, Peter Hasse, Holmvang, Lene, Gregers, Emilie, Kjaergaard, Jesper, Hassager, Christian, Eiskjaer, Hans, Terkelsen, Christian Juhl
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London BioMed Central Ltd 22-05-2021; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Ambulance services; Ambulatory medical care; Blood oxygenation, Extracorporeal; Cardiac arrest; Cardiopulmonary resuscitation; Care and treatment; CPR; CPR (First aid); Critical care; Data collection; Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; Heart attacks; Impella; Laboratories; Mechanical circulatory support; Medical prognosis; Methods; Mortality; Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest; Patient outcomes; Patients; Population; Statistical analysis; Survival analysis; Denmark; Aarhus Denmark
• ISSN: 1364-8535; 1364-8535; 1366-609X; 1466-609X
• DOI: 10.1186/s13054-021-03606-5

Abstract
Background
Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) with either extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or Impella has shown potential as a salvage therapy for patients with refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). The objective of this study was to describe the gradual implementation, survival and adherence to the national consensus with respect to use of MCS for OHCA in Denmark, and to identify factors associated with outcome.
Methods
This retrospective, observational cohort study included patients receiving MCS for OHCA at all tertiary cardiac arrest centers (n = 4) in Denmark between July 2011 and December 2020. Logistic regression and Kaplan–Meier survival analysis were used to determine association with outcome. Outcome was presented as survival to hospital discharge with good neurological outcome, 30-day survival and predictors of 30-day mortality.
Results
A total of 259 patients were included in the study. Thirty-day survival was 26%. Sixty-five (25%) survived to hospital discharge and a good neurological outcome (Glasgow–Pittsburgh Cerebral Performance Categories 1–2) was observed in 94% of these patients
.
Strict adherence to the national consensus showed a 30-day survival rate of 30% compared with 22% in patients violating one or more criteria. Adding criteria to the national consensus such as signs of life during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), pre-hospital low-flow < 100 min, pH > 6.8 and lactate < 15 mmol/L increased the survival rate to 48%, but would exclude 58% of the survivors from the current cohort. Logistic regression identified asystole (RR 1.36, 95% CI 1.18–1.57), pulseless electrical activity (RR 1.20, 95% CI 1.03–1.41), initial pH < 6.8 (RR 1.28, 95% CI 1.12–1.46) and lactate levels > 15 mmol/L (RR 1.16, 95% CI 1.16–1.53) as factors associated with increased risk of 30-day mortality. Patients presenting signs of life during CPR had reduced risk of 30-day mortality (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.52–0.76).
Conclusions
A high survival rate with a good neurological outcome was observed in this Danish population of patients treated with MCS for OHCA. Stringent patient selection for MCS may produce higher survival rates but potentially withholds life-saving treatment in a significant proportion of survivors.