Effect of biogeographic history on population vulnerability in European amphibians

The genetic diversity of populations, which contributes greatly to their adaptive potential, is negatively affected by anthropogenic habitat fragmentation and destruction. However, continental‐scale losses of genetic diversity also resulted from the population expansions that followed the end of the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Conservation biology Vol. 29; no. 4; pp. 1235 - 1241
Main Authors: Dufresnes, Christophe, Perrin, Nicolas
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States Blackwell Scientific Publications 01-08-2015
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Wiley Periodicals Inc
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The genetic diversity of populations, which contributes greatly to their adaptive potential, is negatively affected by anthropogenic habitat fragmentation and destruction. However, continental‐scale losses of genetic diversity also resulted from the population expansions that followed the end of the last glaciation, an element that is rarely considered in a conservation context. We addressed this issue in a meta‐analysis in which we compared the spatial patterns of vulnerability of 18 widespread European amphibians in light of phylogeographic histories (glacial refugia and postglacial routes) and anthropogenic disturbances. Conservation statuses significantly worsened with distances from refugia, particularly in the context of industrial agriculture; human population density also had a negative effect. These findings suggest that features associated with the loss of genetic diversity in post‐glacial amphibian populations (such as enhanced fixation load or depressed adaptive potential) may increase their susceptibility to current threats (e.g., habitat fragmentation and pesticide use). We propose that the phylogeographic status of populations (i.e., refugial vs. post‐glacial) should be considered in conservation assessments for regional and national red lists.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12490
istex:2B7EF43187A093180E1F52B7AEBE00F5E6709064
Swiss National Science Foundation - No. 31003A_129894
ArticleID:COBI12490
ark:/67375/WNG-F27VW5HD-0
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0888-8892
1523-1739
DOI:10.1111/cobi.12490