Genomic Test Results and the Courtroom: The Roles of Experts and Expert Testimony

The rapid advancement from single-gene testing to whole genome sequencing has significantly broadened the type and amount of information available to researchers, physicians, patients, and the public in general. Much debate has ensued about whether genomic test results should be reported to research...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of law, medicine & ethics Vol. 44; no. 1; pp. 205 - 215
Main Authors: Ramos, Edward, Callier, Shawneequa L., Swann, Peter B., Harvey, Hosea H.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Los Angeles, CA SAGE Publications 22-03-2016
Sage Publications, Inc
Cambridge University Press
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The rapid advancement from single-gene testing to whole genome sequencing has significantly broadened the type and amount of information available to researchers, physicians, patients, and the public in general. Much debate has ensued about whether genomic test results should be reported to research participants, patients and consumers, and at what stage we can be sure that existing evidence justifies their use in clinical settings. Courts and judges evaluating the utility of these results will not be immune to this uncertainty. As scholars increasingly explore the duty of care standards related to reporting genomic test results, it is timely to provide a framework for understanding how uncertainty about genetic and genomic tests influences evidentiary considerations in the court room. Here, we explore the subtleties and nuances of interpreting genetic data in an environment of substantial discord related to the value that individuals should place on genetic and genomic tests. In conjunction, we discuss the roles courts should play in qualifying experts, expert testimony, and genetic and genomic tests given the intricate and complex nature of genetic and genomic information.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1073-1105
1748-720X
DOI:10.1177/1073110516644211