Bidirectional and state-dependent modulation of brain activity by transcranial focused ultrasound in non-human primates
Transcranial focused ultrasound (FUS) stimulation under MRI guidance, coupled with functional MRI (fMRI) monitoring of effects, offers a precise, noninvasive technology to dissect functional brain circuits and to modulate altered brain functional networks in neurological and psychiatric disorders. H...
Saved in:
Published in: | Brain stimulation Vol. 14; no. 2; pp. 261 - 272 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
United States
Elsevier Inc
01-03-2021
Elsevier |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Transcranial focused ultrasound (FUS) stimulation under MRI guidance, coupled with functional MRI (fMRI) monitoring of effects, offers a precise, noninvasive technology to dissect functional brain circuits and to modulate altered brain functional networks in neurological and psychiatric disorders. Here we show that ultrasound at moderate intensities modulated neural activity bi-directionally. Concurrent sonication of somatosensory areas 3a/3b with 250 kHz FUS suppressed the fMRI signals produced there by peripheral tactile stimulation, while at the same time eliciting fMRI activation at inter-connected, off-target brain regions. Direct FUS stimulation of the cortex resulted in different degrees of BOLD signal changes across all five off-target regions, indicating that its modulatory effects on active and resting neurons differed. This is the first demonstration of the dual suppressive and excitative modulations of FUS on a specific functional circuit and of ability of concurrent FUS and MRI to evaluate causal interactions between functional circuits with neuron-class selectivity.
•Ultrasound at moderate intensities modulate neural activity bi-directionally.•It suppresses tactile activation at the target while exciting off-target regions.•It’s modulatory effects on active and resting neurons differed.•It likely acts differently on different types of neurons and specific functional circuits. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 These authors are equally responsible for the project. LMC, CC, WAG and JCG designed the experiment. PFY, MAP, SJ, AN, NB, WAG, CC, and LMC participated data collection. PFY and LMC prepared. MAP, SJ and LMC prepared. LMC & PFY wrote the first draft of the manuscript and revised the manuscript together with CC, WAG and JCG. PFY, SJ and MAP contributed to the writing of the main manuscript text. Author contributions |
ISSN: | 1935-861X 1876-4754 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.brs.2021.01.006 |