A comparison of immediate and staged reconstruction of the dorsum of the hand

• Published in: Journal of hand surgery, British volume Vol. 21; no. 2; p. 216
• Main Authors: Sundine, M, Scheker, L R
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Scotland 01-04-1996
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Debridement; Female; Hand Injuries - physiopathology; Hand Injuries - surgery; Hand Strength; Humans; Male; Range of Motion, Articular; Retrospective Studies; Soft Tissue Injuries - physiopathology; Soft Tissue Injuries - surgery; Surgical Flaps; Tendon Transfer; Tendons - transplantation; Treatment Outcome
• ISSN: 0266-7681
• DOI: 10.1016/S0266-7681(96)80102-1

The treatment of complex dorsal hand lesions involving skin and subcutaneous tissues, extensor tendons, and bone remains a difficult problem for reconstructive surgeons. Traditional treatment of these defects uses staged reconstruction, first obtaining soft tissue cover and then performing bone and tendon grafts. The purpose of this study was to compare a series of seven patients who underwent staged reconstruction with seven patients who had immediate reconstruction involving primary bone and tendon grafting. All procedures were performed to correct similar severe dorsal hand defects. Patients with immediate reconstruction had a significantly faster return to maximum range of movement (ROM) (214 days compared to 630 days, P = 0.002), significantly fewer operations (2.1 compared to 5.9, P = 0.002) and a greater chance of returning to work (86% compared to 48.2%, P = 0.3) than patients with staged reconstruction.