National Kriging Exposure Estimation: Liao et al. Respond
Szpiro et al. suggest that our findings Liao et al. (2006) do not adequately support using national-scale, log-normal ordinary kriging to estimate daily mean concentrations of PM sub(10) (paniculate matter with aerodynamic diameter < 10 mu m) at unmonitored locations in the contiguous United Stat...
Saved in:
Published in: | Environmental health perspectives Vol. 115; no. 7; pp. A338 - A339 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. National Institutes of Health. Department of Health, Education and Welfare
01-07-2007
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Szpiro et al. suggest that our findings Liao et al. (2006) do not adequately support using national-scale, log-normal ordinary kriging to estimate daily mean concentrations of PM sub(10) (paniculate matter with aerodynamic diameter < 10 mu m) at unmonitored locations in the contiguous United States. They posit that the absence of the cross-validation SE prevents evaluating the validity of kriging estimation, as we implemented in this context, and the comparability of both regional-versus national-scale kriging and manually modified versus semiautomated, default-calculated semivariograms. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 The authors declare they have no competing financial interests. |
ISSN: | 0091-6765 1552-9924 |
DOI: | 10.1289/ehp.10205R |