A Randomized Comparison of Sirolimus- Versus Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent Implantation in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus

A Randomized Comparison of Sirolimus- Versus Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent Implantation in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus Seung-Whan Lee, Seong-Wook Park, Young-Hak Kim, Sung-Cheol Yun, Duk-Woo Park, Cheol Whan Lee, Myeong-Ki Hong, Kyoung-Suk Rhee, Jei Keon Chae, Jae-Ki Ko, Jae-Hyeong Park, Jae-Hwan Lee...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of the American College of Cardiology Vol. 52; no. 9; pp. 727 - 733
Main Authors: Lee, Seung-Whan, MD, PhD, Park, Seong-Wook, MD, PhD, FACC, Kim, Young-Hak, MD, PhD, Yun, Sung-Cheol, PhD, Park, Duk-Woo, MD, PhD, Lee, Cheol Whan, MD, PhD, Hong, Myeong-Ki, MD, PhD, Rhee, Kyoung-Suk, MD, PhD, Chae, Jei Keon, MD, PhD, Ko, Jae-Ki, MD, PhD, Park, Jae-Hyeong, MD, PhD, Lee, Jae-Hwan, MD, PhD, Choi, Si Wan, MD, Jeong, Jin-Ok, MD, PhD, Seong, In-Whan, MD, PhD, Cho, Yoon Haeng, MD, PhD, Lee, Nae-Hee, MD, PhD, Kim, June Hong, MD, PhD, Chun, Kook-Jin, MD, Kim, Hyun-Sook, MD, PhD, Park, Seung-Jung, MD, PhD, FACC
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: New York, NY Elsevier Inc 26-08-2008
Elsevier Science
Elsevier Limited
Subjects:
RR
SES
MLD
DM
TVR
TLR
MI
AMI
CI
BMS
IQR
QCA
DES
PES
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:A Randomized Comparison of Sirolimus- Versus Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent Implantation in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus Seung-Whan Lee, Seong-Wook Park, Young-Hak Kim, Sung-Cheol Yun, Duk-Woo Park, Cheol Whan Lee, Myeong-Ki Hong, Kyoung-Suk Rhee, Jei Keon Chae, Jae-Ki Ko, Jae-Hyeong Park, Jae-Hwan Lee, Si Wan Choi, Jin-Ok Jeong, In-Whan Seong, Yoon Haeng Cho, Nae-Hee Lee, June Hong Kim, Kook-Jin Chun, Hyun-Sook Kim, Seung-Jung Park To compare the effectiveness of sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) and paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES), we randomly compared SES (n = 200) and PES (n = 200) in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). Six-month in-stent (3.4% vs. 18.2%, p < 0.001) and in-segment restenosis (4.0% vs. 20.8%, p < 0.001) and 9-month target lesion revascularization (2.0% vs. 7.5%, p = 0.017) were significantly lower in the SES versus the PES group. Major adverse cardiac events including death, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization at 9 months (2.0% vs. 8.0%, p = 0.010) were lower in the SES versus the PES group. In conclusion, SES significantly reduced angiographic restenosis and improved clinical outcomes in diabetic patients compared with PES implantation.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-News-2
ObjectType-Feature-3
ISSN:0735-1097
1558-3597
DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2008.04.056