Expanded safety and acceptability of the candidate vaginal microbicide Carraguard® in South Africa
Abstract Background Carraguard's safety and acceptability was assessed among women in Gugulethu and Ga-Rankuwa, South Africa. Study Design A randomized, placebo-controlled, triple-blind trial was conducted in HIV-negative, nonpregnant women who inserted Carraguard or placebo at least three time...
Saved in:
Published in: | Contraception (Stoneham) Vol. 82; no. 6; pp. 563 - 571 |
---|---|
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
New York, NY
Elsevier Inc
01-12-2010
Elsevier |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Abstract Background Carraguard's safety and acceptability was assessed among women in Gugulethu and Ga-Rankuwa, South Africa. Study Design A randomized, placebo-controlled, triple-blind trial was conducted in HIV-negative, nonpregnant women who inserted Carraguard or placebo at least three times a week, including before vaginal sex, for 6 to 12 months. Monthly visits included pelvic examination, sexually transmitted infection (STI) testing/treatment and HIV counseling/testing. Acceptability was assessed quarterly. Results Of 400 women (205 Carraguard, 195 placebo) enrolled, 328 (77%) completed at least 6 months. Incidence of genital epithelial disruption was similar between the Carraguard (13.6 per 100 woman-years) and placebo (21.3 per 100 woman-years) groups (relative risk, 0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.37–1.10); there were no significant differences in rates of HIV/STI, though the study was not powered to determine effectiveness. Only 2% of adverse events were judged possibly related to (either) gel. More than 94% of women reported at least once liking the gel very much. Conclusions Carraguard was not associated with more vaginal, cervical or external genital irritation than placebo, and it was acceptable when used approximately 3.5 times per week, including during sex. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | The Carraguard Phase II South Africa Study Team includes (in alphabetical order): Lydia Altinia, Kelly Blanchardb, Nicol Coetzeea, Alana de Kocka, Christopher Eliasb, Charlotte Ellertsonb, Barbara Friedlandb*, Anwar Hoosenc, Heidi E. Jonesb, Peter H Kilmarx,d Mabitso Marumo,c Elizabeth McGrory,b Constance Monedi,c Gugulethu Ndlovub, Bels Nkompalaa, Annalie Pistoriuse, Gita Ramjeef, Mohlatlego Sebolac, Annik Sorhaindob, Abigail Norris Turnerb, Kathryn Tweedyg, Janneke van de Wijgertb, Manuela M. Williamsc, and Beverly Winikoffb bPopulation Council, New York, NY 10017, USA. dCenters for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA 30333, USA. fMedical Research Council (MRC), Overport, Durban 4067, South Africa. gFamily Health International, Durham, NC 27709, USA. Note: affiliations were at the time the trial was conducted. aUniversity of Cape Town, Dept. of Public Health, Observatory, Cape Town 7925, South Africa. cUniversity of Limpopo, Medunsa Campus, Dept. of Medical Microbiology, Medunsa 0204, South Africa. eUniversity of Limpopo, Medunsa Campus, Dept. of Psychology, Medunsa 0204, South Africa. |
ISSN: | 0010-7824 1879-0518 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.contraception.2010.04.019 |