The effect of challenge and threat states on performance: An examination of potential mechanisms
Challenge and threat states predict future performance; however, no research has examined their immediate effect on motor task performance. The present study examined the effect of challenge and threat states on golf putting performance and several possible mechanisms. One hundred twenty‐seven parti...
Saved in:
Published in: | Psychophysiology Vol. 49; no. 10; pp. 1417 - 1425 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
United States
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01-10-2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Challenge and threat states predict future performance; however, no research has examined their immediate effect on motor task performance. The present study examined the effect of challenge and threat states on golf putting performance and several possible mechanisms. One hundred twenty‐seven participants were assigned to a challenge or threat group and performed six putts during which emotions, gaze, putting kinematics, muscle activity, and performance were recorded. Challenge and threat states were successively manipulated via task instructions. The challenge group performed more accurately, reported more favorable emotions, and displayed more effective gaze, putting kinematics, and muscle activity than the threat group. Multiple putting kinematic variables mediated the relationship between group and performance, suggesting that challenge and threat states impact performance at a predominately kinematic level. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ArticleID:PSYP1449 istex:419E923324AD5A9E87BAB645838ACC9F30825919 ark:/67375/WNG-87W5H37P-R ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 The authors thank Dr. David McIntyre and Dr. Andrew Cooke for their assistance with the kinematic and physiological recording equipment and data analysis software. Furthermore, the authors thank Professor Christopher Ring for his helpful comments regarding the analysis and interpretation of the cardiovascular data. Finally, the authors thank Kirstie Eglon and Christopher Webb for their help with participant recruitment and data collection. |
ISSN: | 0048-5772 1469-8986 1540-5958 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2012.01449.x |