Startle modulation by heat pain with varying threat levels in chronic pain patients and pain-free controls

• Published in: Journal of pain research Vol. 10; pp. 1787 - 1800
• Main Authors: Horn-Hofmann, C, Wolf, D, Wolff, S, Heesen, M, Knippenberg-Bigge, K, Lang, P M, Lautenbacher, S
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New Zealand Dove Medical Press Limited 01-01-2017; Taylor & Francis Ltd; Dove Medical Press
• Subjects: Anesthesiology; Anxiety; Arthritis; Back pain; Care and treatment; Chronic pain; Comorbidity; Development and progression; Fight or flight response (Psychophysiology); Headaches; Medical research; Original Research; pain catastrophizing; Pain management; Physiological psychology; startle; Studies; Therapists; Therapy; threat; Threats; Germany; anxiety; musculoskeletal pain; startle reflex; catastrophizing; threat induction; experimental pain; defensive motivation
• ISSN: 1178-7090; 1178-7090
• DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S136416

Empirical evidence suggests that affective responses to pain are changed in chronic pain. The investigation of startle responses to pain might contribute to clarifying whether such alterations also expand to motivational defensive reactions. We aimed at comparing startle responses to tonic heat pain with high threat (HT) or low threat (LT) in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain and controls. As pain-related anxiety and catastrophizing are typically elevated in chronic pain, we expected to find stronger startle responses in patients specifically under experimental HT.
Patients with chronic musculoskeletal, preferentially, back pain (N = 19) and matched pain-free controls (N = 19) underwent two pain-related threat conditions (high and low) in balanced order. Only, in the HT condition, 50% of the trials were announced to include a short further noxious temperature increase at the end. Startle responses to loud tones were always assessed prior to a potential temperature increase in the phase of anticipation and were recorded by surface electromyogram.
Surprisingly, we observed no differences in startle responses and ratings of emotional and pain responses between patients and controls despite significantly higher pain-related anxiety and catastrophizing in the patients. Overall, startle was potentiated in the HT condition, but only in participants who started with this condition.
Our results suggest that, in general, patients with pain are not more responsive emotionally to experimental threat manipulations despite elevated pain anxiety and catastrophizing. Instead, exaggerated responses in patients might be triggered only by individual concerns relating to pain, which are not sufficiently mirrored by our threat paradigm.