A CpG island methylator phenotype in acute myeloid leukemia independent of IDH mutations and associated with a favorable outcome
Genetic changes are infrequent in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) compared with other malignancies and often involve epigenetic regulators, suggesting that an altered epigenome may underlie AML biology and outcomes. In 96 AML cases including 65 pilot samples selected for cured/not-cured, we found highe...
Saved in:
Published in: | Leukemia Vol. 31; no. 10; pp. 2011 - 2019 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
London
Nature Publishing Group UK
01-10-2017
Nature Publishing Group |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Genetic changes are infrequent in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) compared with other malignancies and often involve epigenetic regulators, suggesting that an altered epigenome may underlie AML biology and outcomes. In 96 AML cases including 65 pilot samples selected for cured/not-cured, we found higher CpG island (CGI) promoter methylation in cured patients. Expanded genome-wide digital restriction enzyme analysis of methylation data revealed a CGI methylator phenotype independent of
IDH1/2
mutations we term AML-CGI methylator phenotype (CIMP) (A-CIMP
+
). A-CIMP was associated with longer overall survival (OS) in this data set (median OS, years: A-CIMP
+
=not reached, CIMP
-
=1.17;
P
=0.08). For validation we used 194 samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas interrogated with Illumina 450k methylation arrays where we confirmed longer OS in A-CIMP (median OS, years: A-CIMP
+
=2.34, A-CIMP
-
=1.00;
P
=0.01). Hypermethylation in A-CIMP
+
favored CGIs (OR: CGI/non-CGI=5.21), and while A-CIMP
+
was enriched in
CEBPA
(
P
=0.002) and
WT1
mutations (
P
=0.02), 70% of cases lacked either mutation. Hypermethylated genes in A-CIMP
+
function in pluripotency maintenance, and a gene expression signature of A-CIMP was associated with outcomes in multiple data sets. We conclude that CIMP in AML cannot be explained solely by gene mutations (for example,
IDH1/2
,
TET2
), and that curability in A-CIMP
+
AML should be validated prospectively. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0887-6924 1476-5551 |
DOI: | 10.1038/leu.2017.12 |