Intra- and inter-individual variability in human sperm concentration, motility and vitality assessment during a workshop involving ten laboratories

• Published in: Human reproduction (Oxford) Vol. 15; no. 11; pp. 2360 - 2368
• Main Authors: Auger, J., Eustache, F., Ducot, B., Blandin, T., Daudin, M., Diaz, I., Matribi, S.El, Gony, B., Keskes, L., Kolbezen, M., Lamarte, A., Lornage, J., Nomal, N., Pitaval, G., Simon, O., Virant-Klun, I., Spira, A., Jouannet, P.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford Oxford University Press 01-11-2000; Oxford University Press (OUP)
• Subjects: Biological and medical sciences; Cell Survival; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Humans; Laboratories; Life Sciences; Male; Mammalian male genital system; Methods; Morphology. Physiology; quality control; routine semen analysis; Sperm Count; Sperm Motility; Spermatozoa - physiology; Vertebrates: reproduction; quality control; routine semen analysis; Human; Spermatozoa; Motility; Semen; Variability; Laboratory; Germinal cell; Vitality; Intraindividual comparison; Interindividual comparison; Quality control; Comparative study; Quantitative analysis
• ISSN: 0268-1161; 1460-2350; 1460-2350
• DOI: 10.1093/humrep/15.11.2360

The aim of the present study was to assess variability in the evaluation of human sperm concentration, motility and vitality. Technicians and biologists from 10 teams involved in multicentre studies on semen quality attended the same laboratory, each team using its own methods and equipment to analyse the same semen samples. Inter-individual variability was assessed from 17 fresh semen samples of varying quality. Intra-individual variability was assessed from pools of frozen samples for sperm concentration and motility and stained smears for vitality with three blind evaluations by sample and smear. The mean inter-individual coefficients of variation were 22.9, 21.8 and 17.5% for sperm concentration, motility and vitality respectively. There was no statistical difference among participants for sperm concentration assessment, but significant differences for both motility and vitality (both P < 0.05). The mean intra-individual coefficients of variation were 15.8, 26.2 and 13.1% for sperm concentration, motility and vitality respectively, with marked differences between expert and novice participants: concentration 9.8% versus 28.0%; motility 22.8% versus 33.0%; and vitality 10.0% versus 19.3%. The present data confirm the need for external quality control schemes for diagnostic purposes, and indicate their utmost importance in multicentre studies on semen quality.