Strengthening research networks: Insights from a clinical research network in Brazil

• Published in: PloS one Vol. 19; no. 8; p. e0307817
• Main Authors: Lopes, Juliana Freitas, Couto, Arnaldo Cézar, Daher, André, Fonseca, Bruna de Paula
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Public Library of Science 01-08-2024; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subjects: Adult; Biobanks; Biomedical Research; Brazil; Care and treatment; Clinical trials; Collaboration; Communication; Communication networks; Communications networks; Communities of practice; Computer and Information Sciences; Cooperation; COVID-19; Data management; Decision making; Dynamic structural analysis; Ethical standards; Evidence-based medicine; Female; Health care reform; Humans; Infectious diseases; Information management; Male; Medical care; Medical research; Medicine and Health Sciences; Medicine, Experimental; Middle Aged; Network analysis; Patients; Professionals; Quality management; Questionnaires; Regeneration; Research and Analysis Methods; Research ethics; Research institutes; Research Personnel; Science Policy; Social network analysis; Social networks; Social organization; Social Sciences; Surveys and Questionnaires; Brazil; Rio de Janeiro Brazil
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307817

Clinical Research Networks (CRNs) are means to improve healthcare delivery, quality of care and patient outcomes. The Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (Fiocruz), Latin America's leading health research organization, has established a CRN to promote interaction and collaboration among its clinical research experts. After a decade of operation, a revitalization process was undertaken out of the need to improve its functionality. This study aimed to describe the evaluation process of the Fiocruz Clinical Research Network (RFPC) by gathering the opinions and perspectives of its members and identifying the network structure. The goal was to improve scientific collaboration and member engagement, thereby increasing the integration, effectiveness, and impact of clinical research conducted at the institution. Clinical research professionals at Fiocruz were invited to participate in an online questionnaire to collect information about their professional experience, the benefits and constraints of participating in research networks, relevant discussion topics, and the challenges of complying with Good Clinical Practices (GCP). With the help of social network analysis, a deeper understanding of the dynamics and structure of professional communication networks was obtained. The questionnaire was completed by 122 professionals (response rate 50.4%), with most respondents being principal investigators (PIs) with more than 10 years of professional experience (24.6%). Participation in research networks was considered beneficial, particularly in working groups (48.4%), and as an opportunity to exchange experiences with other professionals (44.3%). Almost half of the participants (48.4%) did not identify any barriers to participating in a network. Topics that required further discussion included data management, biorepositories and biobanks, and ethical and regulatory issues. Challenges to conducting clinical research with GCP standards included strategic support and funding, staffing and training, data management, infrastructure, quality management, and collaboration. Communication within the research network was loosely structured, with the most experienced professionals holding central positions. This analysis provided valuable insights to support the management of the RFPC. It highlighted the internal community's interests and expectations, identified key areas for improvement in GCP implementation, and influential professionals who could improve information sharing and national integration. The findings have far-reaching implications that can be applied in different contexts. They contribute to the ongoing discussion on the establishment and management of research networks.