Population Extinction and Optimal Resource Management
The optimal exploitation of a population is considered for three stochastic population models; these allow both demographic and environmental variability and the possibility of extinction. The dynamics are linear in the harvest rate; the optimal policy then recommends harvesting at the maximal rate...
Saved in:
Published in: | Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences Vol. 350; no. 1332; pp. 179 - 188 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
London
The Royal Society
29-11-1995
Royal Society of London |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The optimal exploitation of a population is considered for three stochastic population models; these allow both demographic and environmental variability and the possibility of extinction. The dynamics are linear in the harvest rate; the optimal policy then recommends harvesting at the maximal rate above a critical level (the ‘threshold’) and at zero rate below. However, in all cases the optimal threshold differs radically according as to whether one maximizes the total return before extinction or the rate of return per unit time over the period before extinction. In the former case the optimal threshold is at the deterministic equilibrium level of the unexploited population, in the latter case it is approximately at the level of maximal sustainable production. Part of the explanation is that maximization of total yield turns out to be almost equivalent to maximization of time to extinction. Both average yield rate and the expected time to extinction vary with the policy, but the second much more powerfully. Both the criteria above are extreme: one obtains a balanced criterion (and an intermediate threshold) if one maximizes rate of return (before extinction) subject to the conservation requirement of a lower bound on the expected time to extinction. In the case when extinction is excluded because of a potential ‘rescue effect’ one comes to the same view by taking account of the relative time needed to restart an obliterated population. The practical implication is that more attention should be paid to extinction and restart times. For vulnerable populations it is likely that maximal utilization before an inevitable extinction will be achieved at low harvest rates. For large populations or metapopulations, with large times to extinction or quick recovery from a temporary extinction, classical resource models are appropriate. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | This text was harvested from a scanned image of the original document using optical character recognition (OCR) software. As such, it may contain errors. Please contact the Royal Society if you find an error you would like to see corrected. Mathematical notations produced through Infty OCR. istex:17E89D7CB213B2C18B3824DF1B90382C91054F07 ark:/67375/V84-BNSPL7KB-M |
ISSN: | 0962-8436 1471-2970 |
DOI: | 10.1098/rstb.1995.0151 |