Angiotensin–Neprilysin Inhibition versus Enalapril in Heart Failure

The angiotensin receptor–neprilysin inhibitor LCZ696 was compared with the ACE inhibitor enalapril in patients with advanced heart failure. LCZ696 was superior to enalapril in all outcomes. Neprilysin inhibition may replace ACE inhibition for the treatment of heart failure. Angiotensin-converting–en...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The New England journal of medicine Vol. 371; no. 11; pp. 993 - 1004
Main Authors: McMurray, John J.V, Packer, Milton, Desai, Akshay S, Gong, Jianjian, Lefkowitz, Martin P, Rizkala, Adel R, Rouleau, Jean L, Shi, Victor C, Solomon, Scott D, Swedberg, Karl, Zile, Michael R
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Waltham, MA Massachusetts Medical Society 11-09-2014
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The angiotensin receptor–neprilysin inhibitor LCZ696 was compared with the ACE inhibitor enalapril in patients with advanced heart failure. LCZ696 was superior to enalapril in all outcomes. Neprilysin inhibition may replace ACE inhibition for the treatment of heart failure. Angiotensin-converting–enzyme (ACE) inhibitors have been the cornerstone of the treatment for heart failure and a reduced ejection fraction for nearly 25 years, since enalapril was shown to reduce the risk of death in two trials. 1 , 2 Long-term treatment with enalapril decreased the relative risk of death by 16% among patients with mild-to-moderate symptoms. 2 The effect of angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs) on mortality has been inconsistent, 3 , 4 and thus, these drugs are recommended primarily for patients who have unacceptable side effects (primarily cough) while receiving ACE inhibitors. Subsequent studies showed that the use of beta-blockers and mineralocorticoid-receptor antagonists, when added to ACE . . .
ISSN:0028-4793
1533-4406
DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa1409077