Targeting Breast Cancer Stem Cell State Equilibrium through Modulation of Redox Signaling

Although breast cancer stem cells (BCSCs) display plasticity transitioning between quiescent mesenchymal-like (M) and proliferative epithelial-like (E) states, how this plasticity is regulated by metabolic or oxidative stress remains poorly understood. Here, we show that M- and E-BCSCs rely on disti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Cell metabolism Vol. 28; no. 1; pp. 69 - 86.e6
Main Authors: Luo, Ming, Shang, Li, Brooks, Michael D., Jiagge, Evelyn, Zhu, Yongyou, Buschhaus, Johanna M., Conley, Sarah, Fath, Melissa A., Davis, April, Gheordunescu, Elizabeth, Wang, Yongfang, Harouaka, Ramdane, Lozier, Ann, Triner, Daniel, McDermott, Sean, Merajver, Sofia D., Luker, Gary D., Spitz, Douglas R., Wicha, Max S.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States Elsevier Inc 03-07-2018
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Although breast cancer stem cells (BCSCs) display plasticity transitioning between quiescent mesenchymal-like (M) and proliferative epithelial-like (E) states, how this plasticity is regulated by metabolic or oxidative stress remains poorly understood. Here, we show that M- and E-BCSCs rely on distinct metabolic pathways and display markedly different sensitivities to inhibitors of glycolysis and redox metabolism. Metabolic or oxidative stress generated by 2DG, H2O2, or hypoxia promotes the transition of ROSlo M-BCSCs to a ROShi E-state. This transition is reversed by N-acetylcysteine and mediated by activation of the AMPK-HIF1α axis. Moreover, E-BCSCs exhibit robust NRF2-mediated antioxidant responses, rendering them vulnerable to ROS-induced differentiation and cytotoxicity following suppression of NRF2 or downstream thioredoxin (TXN) and glutathione (GSH) antioxidant pathways. Co-inhibition of glycolysis and TXN and GSH pathways suppresses tumor growth, tumor-initiating potential, and metastasis by eliminating both M- and E-BCSCs. Exploiting metabolic vulnerabilities of distinct BCSC states provides a novel therapeutic approach targeting this critical tumor cell population. [Display omitted] •E- and M-BCSCs have divergent sensitivities to glycolysis or redox metabolism inhibition•Hypoxic or oxidant stress promotes M to E state transition by activating AMPK-HIF1α•E-BCSCs are more oxidative (OXPHOS) and reliant on NRF2 antioxidant responses•Co-inhibition of glycolysis and TXN and GSH pathways targets both M- and E-BCSCs Luo et al. report that metabolic stressors modulate breast cancer stem cell (BCSC) state dynamics through ROS-mediated activation of the AMPK-HIF1α axis. They further describe the metabolic pathways and vulnerabilities of epithelial- and mesenchymal-like BCSCs and build a conceptual framework to effectively target both BCSC states in PDX and systemic metastasis models of TNBC.
ISSN:1550-4131
1932-7420
DOI:10.1016/j.cmet.2018.06.006