Perceived user preferences and usability evaluation of mainstream wearable devices for health monitoring

• Published in: PeerJ (San Francisco, CA) Vol. 6; p. e5350
• Main Authors: Jia, Yuxi, Wang, Wei, Wen, Dong, Liang, Lizhong, Gao, Li, Lei, Jianbo
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States PeerJ. Ltd 25-07-2018; PeerJ, Inc; PeerJ Inc
• Subjects: Accuracy; Computational Science; Computers; Data collection; Data Science; Experiments; Feedback; Fitness tracker; Health informatics; Heart rate; Hospitals; Human-Computer Interaction; Outdoor air quality; Pharmacology; Physical fitness; Public Health; Sensors; Shipments; Software; Usability; Usability evaluation; User experience; Wearable computers; Wearable device; China; Beijing China; Usability evaluation; Wearable device; User experience; Fitness tracker
• ISSN: 2167-8359; 2167-8359
• DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5350

There are many problems with fitness trackers, such as device usability, which limit their large-scale application, and relevant studies are limited in terms of their sample size and evaluation methods. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the perceived usability of various mainstream fitness trackers on the market, and to learn about user feedback on feature preferences for each device.
Trial use of seven mainstream fitness trackers (two smart watches and five smart wristbands) followed by a survey study were applied. The questionnaire was specifically developed for this study, which included two parts (user preferences and device usability in five dimensions). We recruited users to test the devices for at least 30 days and asked experienced users to provide feedback in order to evaluate each device, including the rating and user preference of each device.
We received 388 valid questionnaires, in which users rated their responses on a five-point Likert scale. (1) User preference: the average user satisfaction was 3.50-3.86 (points), and the rating for willingness to buy averaged between 3.36 and 3.59. More users were willing to wear (58.3-81.3%) and purchase (56.8-83.0%) the devices than were not. The top three general feature preferences were daily activity tracking, heart health monitoring, and professional fitness tracking. The top three health-related feature preferences were heart rate monitoring, daily pedometer, and professional fitness tracking. (2) Usability evaluation: product design was rated from 3.57 to 4.00; durability, 3.63-4.26; ease of use, 3.70-3.90; added features, 3.30-3.83; and user-rated accuracy, 3.44-3.78. A significant difference was observed in the rating of product design and durability among the different devices (
< 0.05) score.
Users generally had positive subjective intent regarding fitness trackers but were less satisfied with their cost effectiveness. The users preferred health related features such as heart health monitoring, and professional fitness tracking. The rating of most of the current mainstream fitness trackers was fair with some significant differences among the devices. Thus, further improvement is needed.