Inhibitory receptors and ligands beyond PD-1, PD-L1 and CTLA-4: breakthroughs or backups

Although immunotherapeutics targeting the inhibitory receptors (IRs) CTLA-4, PD-1 or PD-L1 have made substantial clinical progress in cancer, a considerable proportion of patients remain unresponsive to treatment. Targeting novel IR–ligand pathways in combination with current immunotherapies may imp...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Nature immunology Vol. 20; no. 11; pp. 1425 - 1434
Main Authors: Andrews, Lawrence P., Yano, Hiroshi, Vignali, Dario A. A.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: New York Nature Publishing Group US 01-11-2019
Nature Publishing Group
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Although immunotherapeutics targeting the inhibitory receptors (IRs) CTLA-4, PD-1 or PD-L1 have made substantial clinical progress in cancer, a considerable proportion of patients remain unresponsive to treatment. Targeting novel IR–ligand pathways in combination with current immunotherapies may improve clinical outcomes. New clinical immunotherapeutics target T cell–expressed IRs (LAG-3, TIM-3 and TIGIT) as well as inhibitory ligands in the B7 family (B7-H3, B7-H4 and B7-H5), although many of these targets have complex biologies and unclear mechanisms of action. With only modest clinical success in targeting these IRs, current immunotherapeutic design may not be optimal. This Review covers the biology of targeting novel IR–ligand pathways and the current clinical status of their immunotherapeutics, either as monotherapy or in combination with antibody to PD-1 or to its ligand PD-L1. Further understanding of the basic biology of these targets is imperative to the development of effective cancer immunotherapies. Checkpoint blockade has revolutionized cancer immunotherapy; however, this approach is effective in only a subset of cancers. In their Review, Vignali and colleagues discuss novel checkpoint targets and their biology and clinical potential.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-2
ISSN:1529-2908
1529-2916
DOI:10.1038/s41590-019-0512-0