Untangling causality in midlatitude aerosol–cloud adjustments

• Published in: Atmospheric chemistry and physics Vol. 20; no. 7; pp. 4085 - 4103
• Main Authors: McCoy, Daniel T., Field, Paul, Gordon, Hamish, Elsaesser, Gregory S., Grosvenor, Daniel P.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Goddard Space Flight Center Copernicus Publications 06-04-2020; Copernicus GmbH
• Subjects: Aerosol-cloud interactions; Aerosols; Albedo; Albedo (solar); Analysis; Atmospheric models; Atmospheric physics; Causality; Climate sensitivity; Climatology; Cloud albedo; Cloud droplets; Cloud microphysics; Clouds; Clouds (Meteorology); Computer simulation; Constraint modelling; Control stability; Covariance; Cyclonic activity; Enthalpy; Heat flux; Heat transfer; Low pressure; Meteorology; Meteorology And Climatology; Microphysics; Precipitation; Radiative forcing; Scavenging; Sea surface; Sea surface temperature; Sensible heat; Sensible heat flux; Sensible heat transfer; Sensitivity; Simulation; Studies; Surface temperature; Uncertainty; Variability; Water; Weather
• ISSN: 1680-7316; 1680-7324; 1680-7324
• DOI: 10.5194/acp-20-4085-2020

Aerosol–cloud interactions represent the leading uncertainty in our ability to infer climate sensitivity from the observational record. The forcing from changes in cloud albedo driven by increases in cloud droplet number (Nd) (the first indirect effect) is confidently negative and has narrowed its probable range in the last decade, but the sign and strength of forcing associated with changes in cloud macrophysics in response to aerosol (aerosol–cloud adjustments) remain uncertain. This uncertainty reflects our inability to accurately quantify variability not associated with a causal link flowing from the cloud microphysical state to the cloud macrophysical state. Once variability associated with meteorology has been removed, covariance between the liquid water path (LWP) averaged across cloudy and clear regions (here characterizing the macrophysical state) and Nd (characterizing the microphysical) is the sum of two causal pathways linking Nd to LWP: Nd altering LWP (adjustments) and precipitation scavenging aerosol and thus depleting Nd. Only the former term is relevant to constraining adjustments, but disentangling these terms in observations is challenging. We hypothesize that the diversity of constraints on aerosol–cloud adjustments in the literature may be partly due to not explicitly characterizing covariance flowing from cloud to aerosol and aerosol to cloud. Here, we restrict our analysis to the regime of extratropical clouds outside of low-pressure centers associated with cyclonic activity. Observations from MAC-LWP (Multisensor Advanced Climatology of Liquid Water Path) and MODIS are compared to simulations in the Met Office Unified Model (UM) GA7.1 (the atmosphere model of HadGEM3-GC3.1 and UKESM1). The meteorological predictors of LWP are found to be similar between the model and observations. There is also agreement with previous literature on cloud-controlling factors finding that increasing stability, moisture, and sensible heat flux enhance LWP, while increasing subsidence and sea surface temperature decrease it. A simulation where cloud microphysics are insensitive to changes in Nd is used to characterize covariance between Nd and LWP that is induced by factors other than aerosol–cloud adjustments. By removing variability associated with meteorology and scavenging, we infer the sensitivity of LWP to changes in Nd. Application of this technique to UM GA7.1 simulations reproduces the true model adjustment strength. Observational constraints developed using simulated covariability not induced by adjustments and observed covariability between Nd and LWP predict a 25 %–30 % overestimate by the UM GA7.1 in LWP change and a 30 %–35 % overestimate in associated radiative forcing.