Safety regulation vs. liability with heterogeneous probabilities of suit

• Published in: International review of law and economics Vol. 28; no. 2; pp. 133 - 139
• Main Author: Rouillon, Sébastien
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New York Elsevier Inc 01-06-2008; Elsevier; Elsevier Science Ltd; Elsevier [1981-....]
• Series: International Review of Law and Economics
• Subjects: Economics and Finance; Humanities and Social Sciences; Liability; Litigation; Regulation; Risk; Safety; Safety standards; Studies; Regulation; Liability; K32; K13; D82
• ISSN: 0144-8188; 1873-6394
• DOI: 10.1016/j.irle.2008.02.002

This article deals with the regulation of activities that entail risk by means of regulatory standard and liability. The original assumption is that the probability that parties might escape liability is variable among the population. The use of each instrument separately is first considered. Under liability, the optimal damages are calculated. From this, it is shown that regulation is superior to liability if harm is not too variable within the population and if the probability of suit is sufficiently variable within the population, and conversely. The use of both instruments at the same time is then analyzed. The optimal combination of a safety standard and a liability schedule is derived. From this, it is proved that a joint use of regulation and liability is always optimal and that the instruments should be designed in a less stringent manner when used jointly.