Nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel and ramucirumab versus paclitaxel and ramucirumab as second-line chemotherapy for unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric cancer: a multicenter, propensity score-matched analysis (CROSS SELL study)

Background Paclitaxel plus ramucirumab (PTX + RAM) is the standard second-line chemotherapy for unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric cancer (AGC). Nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-PTX) is an improved, more convenient form of PTX and is non-inferior to PTX. Although some retrospective...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of clinical oncology Vol. 27; no. 4; pp. 684 - 694
Main Authors: Nakasya, Akio, Hagiwara, Yuya, Ikoma, Tatsuki, Kurioka, Yusuke, Matsumoto, Toshihiko, Yamamoto, Yoshiyuki, Tsuduki, Takao, Kajiwara, Takeshi, Moriwaki, Toshikazu, Nishina, Tomohiro, Yamashita, Natsumi, Hyodo, Ichinosuke
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Singapore Springer Singapore 01-04-2022
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background Paclitaxel plus ramucirumab (PTX + RAM) is the standard second-line chemotherapy for unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric cancer (AGC). Nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-PTX) is an improved, more convenient form of PTX and is non-inferior to PTX. Although some retrospective and single-arm phase II studies regarding nab-PTX + RAM have been reported, comparative studies are lacking. Here, we compared the efficacy and toxicity of nab-PTX + RAM and PTX + RAM using propensity score matching. Methods Clinical data of 265 patients treated for AGC with nab-PTX + RAM or PTX + RAM were retrospectively collected. Nab-PTX was administered at dosages of 100 mg/m 2 , replacing PTX in the standard PTX + RAM regimen. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity were compared using 1:1 propensity score matching. Results In total, 190 (72%) patients were matched. The median PFS was 5.3 [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.4–6.3] and 4.7 (95% CI 3.2–5.3) months in the nab-PTX + RAM and PTX + RAM groups, respectively [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.76, 95% CI 0.56–1.03, p  = 0.07]. The median OS was 11.5 (95% CI 9.2–15.0) and 9.9 (95% CI 8.0–12.7) months, respectively (HR = 0.78, 95% CI 0.56–1.07, p  = 0.12). Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia was observed more frequently in the nab-PTX + RAM group (72% vs. 56%, p  = 0.03). No treatment-related deaths occurred. Conclusions Nab-PTX + RAM exhibited more favorable trends in terms of PFS and OS but was more myelosuppressive than PTX + RAM. As neutropenia is commonly manageable toxicity, nab-PTX + RAM presents a treatment alternative for AGC. Further studies including randomized, controlled studies are warranted.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1341-9625
1437-7772
1437-7772
DOI:10.1007/s10147-022-02114-y