The development and psychometric evaluation of COVID-19 staff questionnaire for infectious disease outbreak readiness and preparedness (SQIDORP)

• Published in: BMC health services research Vol. 22; no. 1; p. 381
• Main Authors: Jokwiro, Yangama, Urbanavicius, Tracy, Robinson, Ainsley M, Scott, Cathy, Islam, Md Rafiqul
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 22-03-2022; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Australia; Control; Coronaviruses; COVID-19; COVID-19 - epidemiology; Design and construction; Disease Outbreaks - prevention & control; Epidemics; Evaluation; Forecasts and trends; Health care workers; Health services; Humans; Infectious disease; Infectious diseases; Pandemics; Prevention; Psychological aspects; Psychometric; Psychometrics; Quantitative psychology; Questionnaires; Reliability; Reproducibility of Results; Services; Staff questionnaire; Surveys and Questionnaires; Tests, problems and exercises; Victoria - epidemiology; Workers; Victoria; Australia; COVID-19; Infectious disease; Health care workers; Staff questionnaire; Reliability; Psychometric
• ISSN: 1472-6963; 1472-6963
• DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-07768-y

The COVID-19 pandemic has inundated the capacity of hospitals across the globe, exhausting resources, and placing extreme burden on health care workers (HCWs). Hospital preparedness during infectious disease outbreak involves development and implementation of appropriate strategies, procedures, and adequate training for HCWs. Reliable and valid tools to evaluate the perception of HCWs on the effectiveness of hospital preparedness strategies are imperative and literature is yet to fill that gap.
Items for 'The Staff Questionnaire for Infectious Disease Outbreak Readiness and Preparedness (SQIDORP)' were selected from literature that addressed hospital preparedness during novel pandemic outbreaks. The SQIDORP was distributed within a regional hospital in Victoria, Australia. Psychometric evaluation included estimates of reliability and factor analysis while factors associated with the questionnaire were explored using regression analysis.
Omega coefficient of 0.89, Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.88 and item-total correlations (> 0.3) indicated adequate reliability of the SQIDORP. Factor Analysis yielded three meaningful latent factors that are effectiveness of training (Factor 1), self-confidence (Factor 2) and risk to self and stress (Factor 3). Demographic factors did not influence the correlation with SQIDORP. However, rating 'the current plan for management of COVID-19 in your ward' and 'personal knowledge/skills in caring for patients with COVID-19' had significant positive correlation and accounted for 33% of the variance in readiness and preparedness using SQIDORP (R2 = 0.33, F = 10.227, P < 0.001).
Most of the items of SQIDORP questionnaire achieved adequate internal consistence reliability. This is a valuable tool that can be utilized by hospitals to explore aspects of preparedness and give insights to the knowledge, skills, and mental health of HCWs, as perceived by the HCW themselves.