Accuracy of axial length, keratometry, and refractive measurement with Myopia Master in children with ametropia

To evaluate the accuracy of axial length, keratometry, and refractive measurement with Myopia Master in ametropic children. In this randomized prospective cross-sectional study, 125 children with ametropia (250 eyes) were recruited (55 boys and 70 girls; age range: 3-15 years). All examinations were...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BMC ophthalmology Vol. 22; no. 1; p. 468
Main Authors: Ye, Yuhao, Zhao, Yu, Han, Tian, Zhang, Xiaoyu, Miao, Huamao, Qin, Bing, Zhou, Xingtao
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 03-12-2022
BioMed Central
BMC
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:To evaluate the accuracy of axial length, keratometry, and refractive measurement with Myopia Master in ametropic children. In this randomized prospective cross-sectional study, 125 children with ametropia (250 eyes) were recruited (55 boys and 70 girls; age range: 3-15 years). All examinations were performed under full cycloplegic conditions. Measurements of axial length (AL), keratometry, and autorefraction acquired with the Myopia Master were compared with those from the IOLMaster 500, IOLMaster 700, Nidek ARK-1, and manifest refraction. The differences between the different methods were analyzed, and their correlation was assessed by interclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), Bland-Altman plot, and correlation test. The ALs (mm) measured with Myopia Master, IOLMaster 500, and IOLMaster 700 were 23.67 ± 1.26, 23.68 ± 1.26, and 23.70 ± 1.25, respectively. The mean values and standard deviations for AL and keratometry readings from these devices were similar (P ≥ 0.059). The ICC analysis also revealed high consistency between the measurements (ICC ≥ 0.943). Additionally, the correlation coefficients were relatively high (r > 0.9, p < 0.001). Although the results of refraction obtained with the Myopia Master were slightly higher than those with manifest refraction (P ≤ 0.024), the agreement between these two measurements was excellent (ICC ≥ 0.858). The percentage of points outside the limits of agreements was < 5.22% in Bland-Altman plots for all analyses. Myopia Master could be a highly efficient tool for clinical use as a three-in-one system (AL, keratometry, and refractive measurements) for screening in children with ametropia.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:1471-2415
1471-2415
DOI:10.1186/s12886-022-02672-9