Differences in verbal and spatial working memory in patients with bipolar II and unipolar depression: an MSI study

• Published in: BMC psychiatry Vol. 21; no. 1; p. 568
• Main Authors: Li, Zhinan, Chen, Junhao, Feng, Yigang, Zhong, Shuming, Tian, Shui, Dai, Zhongpeng, Lu, Qing, Guan, Yufang, Shan, Yanyan, Jia, Yanbin
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 15-11-2021; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Bipolar Disorder; Brain; Cognition; Complications and side effects; Depression; Depressive Disorder; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; Frontoparietal network; Health aspects; Humans; Illnesses; Language; Magnetic resonance imaging; Magnetoencephalography; Memory; Memory, Disorders of; Memory, Short-Term; Mental depression; Mental disorders; Neuroimaging; Patients; Psychiatry; Risk factors; Short term memory; Spatial memory; Variance analysis; Working memory; China; Depression; Working memory; Magnetoencephalography; Frontoparietal network
• ISSN: 1471-244X; 1471-244X
• DOI: 10.1186/s12888-021-03595-3

Depressive symptoms could be similarly expressed in bipolar and unipolar disorder. However, changes in cognition and brain networks might be quite distinct. We aimed to find out the difference in the neural mechanism of impaired working memory in patients with bipolar and unipolar disorder.
According to diagnostic criteria of bipolar II disorder of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) and assessments, 13 bipolar II depression (BP II), 8 unipolar depression (UD) patients and 15 healthy controls (HC) were recruited in the study. We used 2-back tasks and magnetic source imaging (MSI) to test working memory functions and get the brain reactions of the participants.
Compared with HC, only spatial working memory tasks accuracy was significantly worse in both UD and BP II (p = 0.001). Pearson correlation showed that the stronger the FCs' strength of MFG-IPL and IPL-preSMA, the higher accuracy of SWM task within left FPN in patients with UD (r = 0.860, p = 0.006; r = 0.752, p = 0.031). However, the FC strength of IFG-IPL was negatively correlated with the accuracy of SWM task within left FPN in patients with BP II (r = - 0.591, p = 0.033).
Our study showed that the spatial working memory of patients with whether UD or BP II was impaired. The patterns of FCs within these two groups of patients were different when performing working memory tasks.