Dimensionality of the system usability scale among professionals using internet-based interventions for depression: a confirmatory factor analysis

• Published in: BMC psychiatry Vol. 20; no. 1; p. 218
• Main Authors: Mol, Mayke, van Schaik, Anneke, Dozeman, Els, Ruwaard, Jeroen, Vis, Christiaan, Ebert, David D, Etzelmueller, Anne, Mathiasen, Kim, Moles, Bárbara, Mora, Teresa, Pedersen, Claus D, Skjøth, Mette Maria, Pensado, Luisa Peleteiro, Piera-Jimenez, Jordi, Gokcay, Didem, Ince, Burçin Ünlü, Russi, Alessio, Sacco, Ylenia, Zanalda, Enrico, Zabala, Ane Fullaondo, Riper, Heleen, Smit, Jan H
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 12-05-2020; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Analysis; Behavioral medicine; Cognitive ability; Cognitive-behavioral therapy; Confirmatory factor analysis; Depression; Depression (Mood disorder); Depression - diagnosis; Depression - therapy; Europe; Factor analysis; Factor Analysis, Statistical; Humans; Internet; Internet interventions; Internet-Based Intervention; Lewis, John Royston; Mental depression; Psychiatry; Psychometric evaluation; Psychometrics; Quantitative psychology; Questionnaires; Reproducibility of Results; Surveys and Questionnaires; System usability scale; Translations; Usability; Validity; Europe; United Kingdom; Confirmatory factor analysis; Psychometric evaluation; Depression; Internet interventions; System usability scale
• ISSN: 1471-244X; 1471-244X
• DOI: 10.1186/s12888-020-02627-8

The System Usability Scale (SUS) is used to measure usability of internet-based Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (iCBT). However, whether the SUS is a valid instrument to measure usability in this context is unclear. The aim of this study is to assess the factor structure of the SUS, measuring usability of iCBT for depression in a sample of professionals. In addition, the psychometric properties (reliability, convergent validity) of the SUS were tested.
A sample of 242 professionals using iCBT for depression from 6 European countries completed the SUS. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was conducted to test whether a one-factor, two-factor, tone-model or bi-direct model would fit the data best. Reliability was assessed using complementary statistical indices (e.g. omega). To assess convergent validity, the SUS total score was correlated with an adapted Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-3).
CFA supported the one-factor, two-factor and tone-model, but the bi-factor model fitted the data best (Comparative Fit Index = 0.992, Tucker Lewis Index = 0.985, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation = 0.055, Standardized Root Mean Square Residual = 0.042 (respectively χ
(9) = 69.82, p < 0.001; χ
(8)
33.04, p < 0.001). Reliability of the SUS was good (ω = 0.91). The total SUS score correlated moderately with the CSQ-3 (CSQ1 r
 = .49, p < 0.001; CSQ2 r
 = .46, p < 0.001; CSQ3 r
 = .38, p < 0.001), indicating convergent validity.
Although the SUS seems to have a multidimensional structure, the best model showed that the total sumscore of the SUS appears to be a valid and interpretable measure to assess the usability of internet-based interventions when used by professionals in mental healthcare.