Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS): Scale presentation and clinimetric testing results

We present a clinimetric assessment of the Movement Disorder Society (MDS)‐sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS‐UPDRS). The MDS‐UDPRS Task Force revised and expanded the UPDRS using recommendations from a published critique. The MDS‐UPDRS has four parts, namel...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Movement disorders Vol. 23; no. 15; pp. 2129 - 2170
Main Authors: Goetz, Christopher G., Tilley, Barbara C., Shaftman, Stephanie R., Stebbins, Glenn T., Fahn, Stanley, Martinez-Martin, Pablo, Poewe, Werner, Sampaio, Cristina, Stern, Matthew B., Dodel, Richard, Dubois, Bruno, Holloway, Robert, Jankovic, Joseph, Kulisevsky, Jaime, Lang, Anthony E., Lees, Andrew, Leurgans, Sue, LeWitt, Peter A., Nyenhuis, David, Olanow, C. Warren, Rascol, Olivier, Schrag, Anette, Teresi, Jeanne A., van Hilten, Jacobus J., LaPelle, Nancy
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Hoboken Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 15-11-2008
Wiley
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We present a clinimetric assessment of the Movement Disorder Society (MDS)‐sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS‐UPDRS). The MDS‐UDPRS Task Force revised and expanded the UPDRS using recommendations from a published critique. The MDS‐UPDRS has four parts, namely, I: Non‐motor Experiences of Daily Living; II: Motor Experiences of Daily Living; III: Motor Examination; IV: Motor Complications. Twenty questions are completed by the patient/caregiver. Item‐specific instructions and an appendix of complementary additional scales are provided. Movement disorder specialists and study coordinators administered the UPDRS (55 items) and MDS‐UPDRS (65 items) to 877 English speaking (78% non‐Latino Caucasian) patients with Parkinson's disease from 39 sites. We compared the two scales using correlative techniques and factor analysis. The MDS‐UPDRS showed high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.79–0.93 across parts) and correlated with the original UPDRS (ρ = 0.96). MDS‐UPDRS across‐part correlations ranged from 0.22 to 0.66. Reliable factor structures for each part were obtained (comparative fit index > 0.90 for each part), which support the use of sum scores for each part in preference to a total score of all parts. The combined clinimetric results of this study support the validity of the MDS‐UPDRS for rating PD. © 2008 Movement Disorder Society
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-P1X7QL7V-J
ArticleID:MDS22340
Potential conflict of interest: All authors have confirmed they have no conflict of interest related to this effort.
istex:20C8EC0AC3C3656D4CE380BDD9850EAC4AD525BA
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0885-3185
1531-8257
DOI:10.1002/mds.22340