A non-randomised single centre cohort study, comparing standard and modified bowel preparations, in adults with cystic fibrosis requiring colonoscopy

• Published in: BMC gastroenterology Vol. 19; no. 1; p. 89
• Main Authors: Matson, A G, Bunting, J P, Kaul, A, Smith, D J, Stonestreet, J, Herd, K, Hodgson, R S, Bell, S C
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 13-06-2019; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Adults; Age; Bowel preparation; Cancer; Cancer screening; Care and treatment; Cathartics - therapeutic use; Cohort analysis; Cohort Studies; Colon; Colon - surgery; Colon cancer; Colonic cleanse; Colonic lavage; Colonoscopy; Colorectal cancer; Colorectal cancer screening; Colorectal carcinoma; Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis; Colorectal Neoplasms - etiology; Constipation; Councils; Cystic fibrosis; Cystic Fibrosis - complications; Cystic Fibrosis - surgery; Cysts; Data collection; Diet; Early Detection of Cancer - methods; Endoscopy; Female; Fibrosis; Gastroenterology; Health aspects; Humans; Intestine; Laxatives; Male; Medical research; Medical screening; Organ transplantation; Ostomy; Polyps; Population; Preoperative Care - methods; Quality; Risk factors; Surveillance; Systematic review; Task forces; Therapeutic Irrigation - methods; Transplants & implants; Treatment Outcome; Queensland Australia; Australia; United States > US; Colonic cleanse; Colonoscopy screening; Bowel preparation; Polyp detection; Colonoscopy; Colorectal cancer screening; Colonic lavage; Cystic fibrosis; Gastrointestinal visualisation; Modified cystic fibrosis bowel preparation
• ISSN: 1471-230X; 1471-230X
• DOI: 10.1186/s12876-019-0979-z

Adults with cystic fibrosis (CF) have been reported to be at five to ten-fold risk (25 to 30 fold risk after solid organ transplant) of colorectal cancer (CRC) than the general population. Limited publications to date have reported on practical aspects of achieving adequate colonic cleanse producing good visualisation. In this study, we compared two bowel preparation regimens, standard bowel preparation and a modified CF bowel preparation.
A non-randomised study of adults with CF attending a single centre, requiring colonoscopy investigation were selected. Between 2001 and 2015, 485 adults with CF attended the clinic; 70 adults with CF had an initial colonoscopy procedure. After five exclusions, standard bowel preparation was prescribed for 27 patients, and modified CF bowel preparation for 38 patients. Demographic and clinical data were collected for all consenting patients.
There was a significant difference between modified CF bowel preparation group and standard bowel preparation group in bowel visualisation outcomes, with the modified CF bowel preparation group having a higher proportion of "excellent/good" GI visualisation cleanse (50.0% versus 25.9%) and lower rates of "poor" visualisation cleanse (10.5% versus 44.5%) than standard bowel preparation (p = 0.006). Rates of "fair" GI cleanse visualisation were similar between the two groups (39.4% versus 29.6%) (Additional file 1: Table S1). Detection rates of adenomatous polyps at initial colonoscopy was higher in modified CF bowel preparation cohort than with standard preparation group (50.0% versus 18.5%, p < 0.01). Positive adenomatous polyp detection rate in patient's age > 40 years of age was higher (62.5%) than those < 40 years of age (24.3%) (p = 0.003). Colonic adenocarcinoma diagnosis was similar in both groups.
This study primarily highlights that standard colonoscopy bowel preparation is often inadequate in patients with CF, and that colonic lavage using modified CF bowel preparation is required to obtain good colonic visualisation. A higher rate of polyps in patients over 40 years of age (versus less than 40 years) was evident. These results support adults with CF considered for colonoscopy screening at 40 years of age, or prior to this if symptomatic; which is earlier than CRC screening in the non-CF Australian population.