Validity and reliability of fluoroscopy for digital radiography: a new way to evaluate diaphragmatic mobility

• Published in: BMC pulmonary medicine Vol. 17; no. 1; p. 62
• Main Authors: Leal, Bruna Estima, Gonçalves, Márcia Aparecida, Lisboa, Liseane Gonçalves, Linné, Larissa Martins Schmitz, Tavares, Michelle Gonçalves de Souza, Yamaguti, Wellington Pereira, Paulin, Elaine
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 17-04-2017; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Adult; Anesthesia; Anthropometry; Body composition; Body mass; Body mass index; Brazil; Cancer; Chest; Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; Clinical medicine; Computed tomography; Diaphragm; Diaphragm - diagnostic imaging; Diaphragm - physiology; Disease; Female; Fluoroscopy; Fluoroscopy - methods; Healthy Volunteers; Heart rate; Humans; Lung diseases; Magnetic resonance imaging; Male; Medical imaging; Methods; Nervous system; Observer Variation; Paralysis; Pregnancy; Pulmonology; Radiographic Image Enhancement - methods; Radiography; Reproducibility; Reproducibility of Results; Respiration; Respiratory function; Respiratory Function Tests; Spine; Studies; Thorax; Tomography; Ultrasonic imaging; Ultrasound; Underweight; Validity; Values; X-rays; Young Adult; Validity; Fluoroscopy; Reproducibility of results; Diaphragm
• ISSN: 1471-2466; 1471-2466
• DOI: 10.1186/s12890-017-0402-x

Fluoroscopy is considered the most accurate method to evaluate the diaphragm, yet most existing methods for measuring diaphragmatic mobility using fluoroscopy are complex. To assess the validity and reliability of a new evaluation method of diaphragmatic motion using fluoroscopy by digital radiography of healthy adults.
Twenty-six adults were evaluated, according to the parameters: anthropometry and pulmonary function test. The evaluation of diaphragm mobility by means of fluoroscopy by digital radiography method was randomly conducted by two raters (A and B). The Pearson correlation coefficient and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were used to assess the concurrent validity. The inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of the measurement of diaphragmatic motion was determined using ICC and a confidence interval of 95%.
There was a relationship in the assessment of the concurrent validity. There was good inter-rater reliability for right hemidiaphragm mobility and moderate reliability for left hemidiaphragm in the first assessment. In the second assessment, there was good reliability for the mobility of both hemidiaphragms. There was good intra-rater reliability in the mobility of both hemidiaphragms for raters A and B.
The evaluation of diaphragmatic motion using fluoroscopy by digital radiography proved to be a valid and reliable method of healthy adults.