Hyoscine butylbromide for colorectal polyp detection: prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial

• Published in: Clinics (São Paulo, Brazil) Vol. 72; no. 7; pp. 395 - 399
• Main Authors: dos Santos, Carlos Eduardo Oliveira, Moreira, Hamilton, Pereira-Lima, Julio Carlos, Ribas, Carmen Australia Paredes Marcondes, de Quadros Onófrio, Fernanda, Czecko, Alexandre Eduardo Augusti, Ramos, Rafael Koerich, de Carvalho, Caroline Aragão
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Brazil Elsevier España, S.L.U 01-07-2017; Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo; Faculdade de Medicina / USP; Elsevier España
• Subjects: Adenoma; Butylscopolammonium Bromide; Clinical Science; Colonic Neoplasms - diagnosis; Colonic Polyps; Colonic Polyps - diagnosis; Colonoscopy; Colonoscopy - methods; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL; Middle Aged; Precancerous Conditions - diagnosis; Predictive Value of Tests; Prospective Studies; Scopolamine Hydrobromide; Sensitivity and Specificity; Colonic Polyps; Adenoma; Colonoscopy; Scopolamine Hydrobromide
• ISSN: 1807-5932; 1980-5322; 1980-5322
• DOI: 10.6061/clinics/2017(07)01

The removal of pre-malignant colorectal lesions prevents cancer. Hyoscine has been proposed as a means of improving diagnosis by reducing colonic movements. The aim of this study was to analyze whether this anti-spasmodic enhances the detection of pre-malignant colorectal lesions.
In a randomized, double-blinded fashion patients received hyoscine or a saline solution in all consecutive colonoscopies in which the cecum was reached. Lesions were analysed with respect to number, size, location, histology and capillary pattern.
A total of 440 colonoscopies were randomized. The overall polyp detection rate (PDR) and the adenoma detection rate (ADR) were 65.2% and 49.3%, respectively. In the hyoscine group, non-polypoid lesions were detected significantly more often (p=0.01). In the placebo group 281 lesions were diagnosed (202 adenomas) and in the hyoscine group 282 lesions were detected (189 adenomas) (p=0.23). The PDR and ADR were similar between the placebo and hyoscine groups (64% vs 66% and 50% vs 47%, respectively). No differences were observed between the two groups in the advanced-ADR or advanced neoplasia detection rate, as well the mean numbers of polyps, adenomas, advanced adenomas and advanced neoplasias detected per patient. The administration of hyoscine also did not improve the diagnostic accuracy of digital chromoendoscopy. The presence of adenomatous polyps in the right colon was detected significantly more frequently in the hyoscine group (OR 5.41 95% CI 2.7 - 11; p<0.01 vs OR 2.3 95% CI 1.1 - 4.6; p=0.02).
The use of hyoscine before beginning the withdrawal of the colonoscope does not seem to enhance the PDR and the ADR.